[Libre-soc-dev] Final notice
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at lkcl.net
Thu Aug 29 19:33:44 BST 2024
michiel,
i have already spoken and yet again you are not listening and forcing
me to repeat myself.
the existing RFPs are valid 100% and your closure of them was abuse,
as you failed catastrophically to engage in 2-way conversation taking
into account the combined effects of autism and Domestic Verbal Abuse,
which place me directly into shock and place me at risk of death.
YOU will be correcting YOUR problem at YOUR end.
please do not make your problem - your abuse by engaging in one-way
communication, through failure to listen - my problem.
far from forcing *me* to declare that your abuse was acceptable, that
the RFPs were invalid and that i have been incompetent all these years
to run a project - *you* will be re-opening the RFPs that you should
never have closed.
you have just forced me to repeat this *again*.
when will you learn to LISTEN?
stop making statements at me that indicate YOU ARE NOT LISTENING!
you have ONE DAY in which to correct the mistake that you have made.
i have 2 weeks money left. that EUR 20,000 represents money that will
get me through the winter and prevent me from freezing and starving.
but i will NEVER compromise. i have SPOKEN. THIS IS HOW AUTISM IS.
it does not matter if it is 200,000 or 2,000,000 i WILL NEVER RE-RAISE
RFPS THAT YOU ABUSIVELY CLOSED because they are ONE HUNDRED PERCENT
VALID AND LEGITIMATE.
l.
---
geometry: without it life is pointless
the fibonacci series: easy as 1 1 2 3
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 6:05 PM Michiel Leenaars <michiel at nlnet.nl> wrote:
>
> Dear Luke,
>
> if you still want to make a new payment request for project 2021-02-052 (The Libre-SOC Gigabit Router) and project 2021-08-071 ("Libre-SOC Cavatools: Power ISA Simulator"), we advise you to do so at very short notice. We are currently closing the books, and after tomorrow (August 30th 2024) at noon CEST, we will no longer accept any new payment requests for these projects. We will also not enter into more arguments.
>
> We have noted with gratitude that in recent days various people have stepped in to help you complete these projects to the best of their abilities, and in particular have worked on providing a partial overview of the outcomes at:
>
> - https://libre-soc.org/crypto_router_asic
> - https://libre-soc.org/docs/pypowersim
>
> This has certainly made a difference in our ability to understand what happened in the two projects, though we are still not sure how these texts map precisely on all of the tasks defined within their respective plans. Pypowersim in particular is very much underdocumented and hard to find at present still - the README from the openpower-isa monorepo doesn't even mention it exists. How it compares to Cavatools, and what functionality is implemented is missing. We are for instance also not clear how the pypowersym guide relates to the current state of task 984 (https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=984), as concrete outcomes for that are still lacking.
>
> Would you therefore be so kind to put in separate claims for each of the remaining individual tasks, and provide the relevant direct links for each alongside your payment request? Please add any remaining information you have that can help to review the work efficiently. We apologise for the extra work this may cause, but the alternative is to not offer you the opportunity to still claim (part of the budget).
>
> Kind regards,
> Michiel Leenaars
More information about the Libre-soc-dev
mailing list