[Libre-soc-dev] 58498 Care Quality Commission MHA-03402-V5V8D1 Desired outcomes CRM:003564158488

[lkcl]

(as background: I have just been diagnosed as having a bleed on the brain.
I need to absorb this and keep further psychological trauma to a minimum).

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21303793/

to the Care Quality Commission: I just saw the above peer-reviewed
publication. it is what I have experienced from the NHS, systematically for
eleven months.

however the primary reason I am contacting you now is to request you - and
the General Medical Council (BCC'd to keep the Fitness to Practice Team's
email confidential) to take over pursuing prosecution of Dr Thagadur and
others as outlined in the above article:

    Doctors and nurses caring for patients under
    the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental
    Capacity Act 2005 may however be
    prosecuted for wilful neglect of a patient.

it is most emphatically the case that there was no care. only a handful of
nurses (Duncan, Maya, in particular) engaged in actual care: the rest were
neglectful or actively and wilfully caused harm.

please can you coordinate amongst yourselves and confirm who will take the
lead in prosecution. if consulted I would suggest that the GMC Fitness to
Practice Team would be the best.

you will need to take into account that I am in no position to take
initiative on this matter as the torture has compromised my ability to even
talk about it - sometimes literally, as happened a few days ago when the
bleed opened up again in a major way and stopped me from being able to
speak for over 36 hours.

l.


On Friday, December 6, 2024, lkcl <luke.leighton at gmail.com> wrote:

> regarding the torture at Antelope House Brinton's Terrace Southampton
> under the "supervision" of Dr Thagadur:
>
> please explain why nobody has requested to see these photographs of
> hand-written notes one of which clearly shows TWO TIAs occurring within
> minutes of each other (0:39 and 0:51) after UNSUPERVISED non-informed
> non-consensual AGENCY-STAFF-ADMINISTERED forcibly-coerced ingestion of a
> known-toxic inflammatory-inducing substance.
>
> [threats were made: "if you do not take this toxic substance we will hold
> you down and inject you with it". my legally-permitted objections in
> writing were met every single time with this distressing threat].
>
> please explain why the timestamp on my handwritten notes agrees with the
> date of the document, notes that I informed you of my dietary requirements
> in writing ON THE 26TH MAY 2024, yet your "Final Response" states very
> clearly "my autism dietary requirements were met by yourselves".
>
> please provide the meticulously-accurate Medical Records which you must
> have on file that indicate in writing WHAT TYPE OF MEDICAL DIET YOU CLAIM I
> INFORMED YOU I AM ON and WHAT IS THE DATE AND TIME OF THAT ENTRY and BY
> WHOM.
>
> l.
>
>