[Libre-soc-dev] F24-561 Response

[lkcl]

dear foi team,

with much gratitude for your kind acknowledgement of the
Autism Act 2009 and its statutory requirements. yes your
response was clear and respectful.

moving on to its substance: i am a little alarmed to learn
that MPs have *no law covering their conduct*! this would
seem to be a massive oversight by which lack of accountability
could result in any given MP acting with impunity.

i contrast this with Taiwan where the full day-to-day activities
of every Civil Servant are not just a matter of public record
there is *unrestricted* world-wide access to the same!

Saqib Bhatti MP has already demonstrated a blatant disregard
for me by contacting *other people* about me, rather than talk
to me about me, and I will be absolutely brutally honest in
saying I am terrified he might be goaded into actively
seeking vengeance if I attempt to interact with him, especially
if *he himself* holds the evidence (if not already destroyed)
of wrongdoing regarding his conversations with CALDERWOOD.

your suggestion to make a FoI request to Hants is
appreciated, and one i would take if already on it.

i received a response today: they have dodged by
mis-interpreting my request as an *explanation*
for the unprofessional misconduct, as opposed to my *actual*
request being for the full and complete records of all
conversations.

i am sure that many people will be fascinated to learn that
MPs operate with no law governing their public accountability.

l.


On Wednesday, December 4, 2024, FOI Commons <FOICOMMONS at parliament.uk>
wrote:
> Dear Luke Leighton,
>
>
>
>
>
> Freedom of Information Request F24-561
>
>
>
> Thank you for your request for information as copied below.
>
>
>
> Thank you also for asking us to use the Autism Communications Protocol.
We hope our response below is clear and helpful, but if you have any other
questions please let us know.
>
>
>
> You asked us for all copies of all correspondence, telephone logs and
transcripts, emails, and instructions received, initiated or made by Saqib
Bhatti MP and David Calderwood that mention your name and/or discusses you
in any way.  You have asked this to include direct or indirect
communications with Hampshire County Council.
>
>
>
> The House of Commons doesn’t hold any of that information, but I hope the
following explanation helps you understand why.
>
>
>
> Members of Parliament (MPs) are separate to the House of Commons.  We do
not employ MPs, and they do not report details of their work to us.  MPs
may use some of our services to communicate, such as our telephone systems,
postal services and/or a parliamentary IT account.  However, we do not have
access to any of those communications.  More information about that can be
found on our website here:
https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/freedom-of-information/information-we-do-not-hold/
.
>
>
>
> You could ask Saqib Bhatti MP directly for the information you seek.
Contact details are available at:
http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/.  However, MPs are not
legally obliged to answer FOI requests, because they are not covered by the
Freedom of Information Act 2000.
>
>
>
> Alternatively, you could ask Hampshire County Council for their copies of
any correspondence.  Their contact details can be found on their webpages
at:
https://www.hants.gov.uk/aboutthecouncil/informationandstats/freedomofinformation
.
>
>
>
>
>
> If you are unhappy with our response, you can complain by emailing us at
foicommons at parliament.uk.  Please let us know why you are unhappy to allow
us to address all your concerns.  After that, if you are still
dissatisfied, you may appeal to the Information Commissioner’s Office,
whose contact details can be found on their website here:
https://ico.org.uk/.
>
>
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
>
>
> Thomas Spencer
> Information Rights Officer
> House of Commons Information Compliance Service
>
> House of Commons, Palace of Westminster, London SW1A 0AA
> parliament.uk
>
> </mail/u/0/s/?view=att&th=1939298c618dee5d&attid=0.1&disp=emb&zw&atsh=1>
>
> The House of Commons welcomes feedback. If you have any compliments,
complaints or comments
> about the service that you have received please complete the online
feedback form
>
> For information about how the House of Commons uses your personal data
please see our privacy notices:
> www.parliament.uk/site-information/data-protection
>
>
>
> From: lkcl <luke.leighton at gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2024 6:01 AM
> To: FOI Commons <FOICOMMONS at parliament.uk>
> Subject: FOI request regarding SAQIB BHATTI MP
>
>
>
> AUTISM ACT 2009 IS IN FORCE.
> YOU ARE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW AUTISM COMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOL.
> I AM AT RISK OF DEATH IF DISTRESSED OR SHOCKED.
> AUTISM ACT STATUTORY REQUIREMENT: PLEASE NOTIFY ME BY TELEPHONE
> **ONLY** IF BELOW IS UNCLEAR IN ANY WAY.
>
> my name is luke kenneth casson leighton.
> correspondance address is PO BOX 18, 317 Shirley Rd, Southampton
> telephone number 075 985 23119.
>
> SAQIB BHATTI was manipulated by DAVID CALDERWOOD to assault me.
> the matter has been reported to Hampshire police under crime
> reference 44240463915
>
> i require all copies of all correspondance all telephone logs
> and transcripts of same all emails all instructions received
> initiated or made by BHATTI AND CALDERWOOD that mention my
> name and/or discuss me in ny way.
>
> this includes communication, direct or indirect, to Hampshire
> County Council.
>
> you are of course under a legal obligation to preserve evidence
> and to pass it to the police for investigation into the criminal
> activity that took place. this obligation shall in no way
> compromise your required compliance with the above request.
>
> context regarding the malicious GBH by CALDERWOOD:
>
> https://lists.libre-soc.org/pipermail/libre-soc-dev/2024-May/006248.html
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer: this e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and
delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is
not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability
is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
This e-mail address is not secure, is not encrypted and should not be used
for sensitive data.