[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 939] NLnet 2021 cavatools proposal 2021-08-071

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=939

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |2021-08-071 at nlnet.nl

--- Comment #25 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> ---
To EC Commission and to Auditors: i am still recovering from
abuse and still have a stalker. below you can see that
Michiel Lenaars of NLnet is unable to take into consideration
the true extent of the damage done to my health. he and
Bob Goudriaan have both been informed repeatedly that i have
nearly died multiple times as a result of the abuse, but
they are unable to appreciate or acknowledge the seriousness.
i will attempt to answer inline below, but if it becomes
too distressing i will have to stop, recover, and carry on
another time: for example, recalling and relating the abusive
events when giving statements to the police *caused* medical
distress and caused phyisical collapse, every single time.
i cannot continue to let that happen: i need to recover from
the medical physical effects of the abuse. my recovery is
underway but in all seriousness that recovery is very sadly
impeded by NLnet not listening. i have attempted to engage
Medation services (Brian, Technology Cultivation) but they
are not listening to me telling them how distressing that it
is that they are not listening, and refused repeatedly to
engage Mediation to help get across to them how much harm
it is causing to my physical health recovery that they are
not listening.

i leave it at that and will begin answering below.

(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #24)
> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 01:50:18 +0200
> From: Michiel Leenaars <michiel at nlnet.nl>
> To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net>
> Subject: Re: Re: Get well
> 
> Dear Luke,
> 
> (dropping Brian to bcc, this is outside of the scope for him)
> 
> Thanks for initiating the writeup. This is a step in the right direction.
> 
> any embarrassment caused by your STATEMENT "you have not
> achieved the goals" i cannot help you with. you should
> have listened and ASKED THE QUESTION:
> 
> "it seems that you have not met the deliverables.
>  have i missed anything here? what actually happened?"
> 
> Am I correct in interpreting that you suggest you are quoting us saying "you
> have not achieved the goals"?

yes.

this is literally the first clarifying question that you have ever asked.

> Where precisely did you get this statement
> from?

read bob's (currently private) message again.

> We did write:
> 
> "For each pending payment request, please ensure there is a final comment in
> the issue tracker indicating where to find the concrete outcome of the task,
> along with a description and justification of any deviations from the
> original description. We have attempted to understand your progress, but it
> is currently opaque and lacks the previous level of structure."

that is because i am recovering from deep trauma and shock which has
caused organ damage as well as neuro-physiological damage.
i have informed you of this repeatedly.

> What is precisely accusatory in what we wrote? We only ask for
> clarification, in the clear absence of a wrap up of most invidual tasks and
> of the project as a whole. What did you find unreasonable in that?

you have misunderstood.

the failure on your part to listen was well before you asked for this.



> Now on the substance:
> 
> What do you hope to gain by adding your medical and relational history in a
> public document that is intended as serious proof of work?

asking what i "hope to gain" is not an appropriate question, it is shockingly
insulting and a distressing accusation that i somehow "benefit".

as an autistic adult whom you have been informed many times that i am
disabled as a result of that autism, i need you rephrase this question
so that it does not start with a distressing accusation.

if you are not familiar with how to ask questions of autistic adults
so that you do not put them into distress, please look it up or
engage the urgent services of Brian (as i have asked you to do 
for two weeks now) so that i can safely explain it to him, and he
can explain it to you.

> the wrap-up professional, factual and on topic. Accusations to e.g. your
> ex-wife or former colleagues do not belong here, or in fact anywhere on the
> issue tracker/mailing list/etcetera. Could you please clean this up?

please clarify:

1. are you asking me to censor reports?
2. are you asking me to censor bugreports?
3. are you asking me to censor the  mailing list?
4. are you asking me to censor anything else?

i cannot continue for today, i am overwhelmed by answering and need to
recover so as not to damage my physical and neuro-physiological health.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.