[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 589] NLnet top-level gigabit crypto router 2021-02-052

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589

--- Comment #18 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #17)
> Michiel Leenaars
> to me, Bob
> 4 minutes agoDetails
> Dear Luke,
> 
> 
>> i need *help* doing so.
> 
> This is what people have offered, and you deemed unnecessary.

what?? i have requested multiple times that you STOP making false
statements and judgements.

for god's sake ASK QUESTIONS, i am BEGGING YOU.

you should have ASKED.

"DO WE UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY that you have refused help?"



> So the offer was for us to clear out the existing RfPs, so you would be
> able to make new payment requests with the information needed.
> 
> We cannot be "chasing the chain" [1] at this point.

due to the ABUSE, michiel, jacob and i are completely beyond exhaustion, and
the rest of the people who worked on this have LEFT and are not responding.



> Eg. leaving the work in place after a comment like "should we consider
> this done due to running out of time" (also [1]) without the work being
> consolidated somewhere isn't a proper closing.
> 
> [1] https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785#c13

the *entire project* has run on that basis michiel, for seven years!

we do what we can within the budget, having a "loose" and CLEARLY DEFINED
milestone, working TOWARDS that goal.

we do not specify EXACT NUMBERS of instructions for example because
due for example to jacob's repeated consistent inability to judge time
and work estimates, he listed OVER A HUNDRED instructions on a TODO list
for a budget of work and time of only THREE WEEKS.

i therefore repeatedly had to tell him to cut back to REALISTIC AMOUNTS OF
WORK.

yet AGAIN you have NOT ASKED QUESTIONS.

you should have asked "CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN because this comment looks
on FIRST GLANCE like it 

you've yet AGAIN made an ACCUSATION.

please STOP MAKING ACCUSATIONS.

this is why i asked you until the point of total exhaustion to ENGAGE A
MEDIATOR,
and to give me the EC contact details because you KEEP MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS
AND ACCUSATIONS and WILL NOT ACCEPT THAT YOU ARE DOING SO.

> The project is building a Gigabit Router, and it should be clear at the
> end of the project where the work stands and where any moving part goes.
> The same holds for the other project.
> 
> 
> what works for me is to be ASKED QUESTIONS, to GUIDE me
> through the process of getting the answers you need.
> 
> There is no opportunity for that, nor are the conditions you sketch
> acceptable or reasonable. I suggest you organise matters at your end
> such that someone else will do this for you, or with you.


> 
> absolutely not. i will remove the access rights of anyone
> that attempts to do so.
> 
> In that case, there might be little point of going on with the above -
> we will not accept your abuse of others in an official deliverable.

i am REQUIRED to make an accurate report. you have NOT asked for evidence
of ABUSE. you have IGNORED that criminal activity has taken place.
you have IGNORED that i am DISABLED.

get me the EC contact details.

fifth time of asking.

you have refused each time to date.

>  This
> constitutes multiple violations of the IEEE code of conduct to which all
> grantees are bound as per the Memorandum of Understanding.

what??? so if that's the case, then you are prohibited from paying
MARGARITIS, and have violated the IEEE Code by paying RED Semiconductor
Ltd when i told you that their Directors CALDERWOOD and LEWIS have been
ABUSIVE and engaged in Coercive Controlling Behaviour against a DISABLED
individual (myself) as well as other criminal activity.


> I would strongly urge you to reconsider, 

STOP! i have told you NO. no means NO! for god's sake wy are you not
listening when i say **NO**


> as this crosses professional
> and legal boundaries and would prevent payment.

i will not censor the truth. i have told you MULTIPLE TIMES i am autistic. my
mother has told you i am autistic. you have NOT adjusted to take that into 
account in your interactions with me. i have despertely repeated that you
need to ASK QUESTIONS and STOP MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS.

asking someone who has committed themselves for THIRTY YEARS to operating
in Works for the Public Good, and has always spoken truth, to CENSOR what
they say, is SHOCKING.

why would you keep repeatedly requesting me to CENSOR the truth, michiel?

i do not understand.

the only thing that makes sense here is if you have been threatened with
legal action (which we know that my brother, DANIEL LEIGHTON, has actually
done, IN WRITING).


> We will not do back and forth messages about this anymore, this isn't a
> negotiation. Please only notify us when the work is completed,

notification given. the work is completed.

if you do not understand ASK QUESTIONS FOR GOD'S SAKE.

> Please ask someone you trust to
> clarify our requests, and if need be these people can ask us for
> clarification.

so you trust OTHER PEOPLE, but having been subjected to ABUSE which
almost KILLED me, and has left me with BRAIN DAMAGE, you do not trust ME??

you state "we are not going to listen to you but we will listen to other
people"? 

what the hell is going on michiel??


>  The next message you send to us will trigger the final
> review of these deliverables - and if the work isn't completed (or at
> least considerably approved) at that point we will close the dossier.

placing me in financial jeapordy because of failures on your part to
listen *to me*??

you need to get me those EC contact details.

no excuses, no "i doubt they will listen".

get me the EC contact details today.

sixth time of asking.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.