[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 550] binutils support needed for svp64

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550

--- Comment #71 from dmitry.selyutin at 3mdeb.com ---
A question on matching the names: we have bunch of instructions named like
"4/6=mtfsfi", "26/6=fmrgow", etc. In good ol' PPC, these have no prefixes, I
assume SVP64 added them? Should I simply discard everything before '=' sign to
keep the name as it appears in binutils?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.