[Libre-soc-dev] RFC on mission
oliva at gnu.org
Sun Nov 29 21:08:50 GMT 2020
On Nov 29, 2020, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 8:14 PM Alexandre Oliva <oliva at gnu.org> wrote:
>> Is there any reason you'd rather not adopt the proposed wording?
> none at all
Here's the proposed change, updated on top of the recent changes.
diff --git a/The_Mission.mdwn b/The_Mission.mdwn
index 8b0e40d4..f4c3d753 100644
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
- to give mass volume appliance manufacturers an alternative to expensive
-- to maximize the degree of trust a customer (business or user) can place in
+- to maximize the degree of trust customers and users can place in
- to provide a libre, secure and transparently developed hybrid CPU VPU
GPU architecture to the world.
Ok to install?
Now, right after the above, there's another bullet:
- to provide businesses and users worldwide with an alternative to
current proprietary opaque chipsets and drivers.
that comes across to me as suggesting that users are only individuals,
which sort of misdirects the meaning of the change we discussed and
To me, users can be businesses, governments, NGOs, individuals, etc.
Another potential reading of the above would be to take 'businesses' as
meaning 'suppliers', that nicely complements the broad understanding of
'users' that I favor. Is that the intent?
If so, is there any difference of intent behind the spellings 'customers
and users' and 'businesses and users'?
Apropos: https://xkcd.com/2390/ seems to be making fun of me ;-)
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
Vim, Vi, Voltei pro Emacs -- GNUlius Caesar
More information about the Libre-soc-dev