[Libre-soc-dev] [Libre-soc-isa] next ISA WG RFC

[Jacob Lifshay]

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023, 10:40 Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023, 10:10 Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023, 04:10 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> * carryless mul/div/mod
>>>
>> these are basically good to go, though imho are less critical so can be
>> left for later when we need a break from more complex stuff.
>>
>
> imho carryless mul should be left till after submitting basic SVP64 FFT
> support, otherwise `cltmadd` has little justification as a scalar op.
>

alternative idea: submit everything but cltmadd to avoid someone else
submitting an alternative clmul first in a way that doesn't work well with
our proposal. cltmadd can then later be submitted as a separate RFC as
SVP64 FFT support for clmul.

Jacob

>