[Libre-soc-dev] Suggestions and clarifications to overcome symbiflow stuck at VPR - Reg.,
manikandan_phd at outlook.com
Mon Oct 11 06:48:27 BST 2021
Yes, as Veera mentioned luke has done it already.
That is the reason I am suggesting here to replace VPR with nextpnr in the Symbiflow.
It is accepted by the Symbiflow also.
Thanks and Regards
From: Veera <vklr at vkten.in>
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021, 11:12
To: MANIKANDAN NAGARAJAN
Cc: libre-soc-dev at lists.libre-soc.org
Subject: Re: [Libre-soc-dev] Suggestions and clarifications to overcome symbiflow stuck at VPR - Reg.,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 04:14:45AM +0000, MANIKANDAN NAGARAJAN wrote:
> Dear Team,
> Base on my learning I would like to suggest that symbiflow support *nextpnr* also for the same purpose VPR is exist in symbiflow.
> (pls check Place & Route in SymbiFlow section in the above link)
> Libre-SoC flow is already well compatible with nextpnr and bitstream files generated for ECP5 with that.
> May I know anybody has already verified this with nextpnr? if no, my suggestion is to give a try with nextpnr and I believe that will successfully complete the symbiflow.
AFAIK, Luke, has tested libresoc with ECP5 board using nextpnr and prjtrellis
> With Regards
> Manikandan Nagarajan
More information about the Libre-soc-dev