[Libre-soc-dev] bug in microwatt stfsu and stfdu
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at lkcl.net
Thu May 20 02:07:32 BST 2021
On Thursday, May 20, 2021, Paul Mackerras <paulus at ozlabs.org> wrote:
>
> Arguably the spec could/should have something like this in the RTL:
>
> if RA = 0 then
> invalid_form()
> else
> ... (existing RTL)
> endif
agreed.
a case could be made for:
if RA = 0 then
invalid_form()
... (existing RTL)
on the basis that the function would return if the trap decided to allow
the existing RTL to proceed.
i woild advocate that this is incorect, that your pseudocode is correct, on
the basis that it is the *trap* that must take responsibility for full
compliant (emulated) implementation of the instruction.
just like in lib/powerpc/sstep.c
l.
--
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
More information about the Libre-soc-dev
mailing list