[Libre-soc-dev] v3.1B prefix

[Cole Poirier]

On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 10:23 AM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
<lkcl at lkcl.net> wrote:
>
> think it through: where in any of the proposal was there a mention of
> 16-bit alighment?
>
> what was the premise from yesterday?
>
> it was that 16/48 was elimintated, was it not?

I misinterpreted 32 bit as 32 bit prefixed i.e. 48 bit. Thanks for the
clarifying questions. I understand now.

Cole