[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 1212] NLnet 2023 Simple-V RISC-V binutils

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212

--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Selyutin <ghostmansd at gmail.com> ---
The preferred order and also sometimes the dependency chain:

1199 is the most critical one. Without it, we'll have to implement all the
missing bits of libopid, insndb and binutils manually. I'd say it's a blocker
for 1200, 1201.

1200 (libopid SVP64 support) blocks 1201 (binutils libopid migration), because
binutils are to be based on libopid, but need SVP64 support there.

1201 (binutils libopid migration) blocks 1203 (binutils vs insndb tests).

Preferably insndb and libopid (and also any code it relies on) must be
decoupled (1202). For binutils (1201) I'd say it's critical. We cannot force
binutils clone a huge openpower-isa repository and get along with its setup.
Keeping a copy of the generated code is also a bad option. Perferably the code
should be "freestanding".

I'll link the task dependencies later, that's just a comment to keep this in
mind.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.