[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 1125] split instructions' pseudo-code into separate files so they can be [[!inline]]-ed into the wiki

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1125

--- Comment #8 from Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #7)
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #6)
> > no: the way i would like it done is that the RFCs *include the entire
> > instruction* and if the RFC is different the *instruction* is modified
> > (and the parser to match) to cope.
> 
> ok, how about this:
> 
> we have the entire RFC instruction entry in e.g.
> openpower/isa/bitmanip/sadduw.mdwn and have the pseudo-code separated out
> into openpower/isa/bitmanip/sadduw_code.mdwn.

because both our latest proposals involves having the full RFC text for each
instruction, the parser will need a decent amount of modification to parse
that, so this bug needs some budget assigned. since this makes RFCs
automatically stay in sync with the pseudocode we actually test, would taking
it from the "write RFCs" budget be good? (I'll find the bug number later)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.