[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 1068] add instructions from ls012 not currently implemented in binutils

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1068

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
       The table of|                            |ghostman=1600
  payments (in EUR)|                            |lkcl=400
     for this task;|                            |
        TOML format|                            |
   budget (EUR) for|3000                        |2000
         this task,|                            |
          excluding|                            |
   subtasks' budget|                            |
 total budget (EUR)|3000                        |2000
  for completion of|                            |
       task and all|                            |
           subtasks|                            |
             Status|IN_PROGRESS                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #18 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Dmitry Selyutin from comment #16)

> 
> Also now binutils support SFFS flag and new options, -mdraft-sffs and
> -mdraft-svp64, both are included by -mlibresoc:
> https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;
> h=5f2e46af4ef4222a5172e7b69c486cef3d03c2d5

fantastic! like it.

(In reply to Dmitry Selyutin from comment #17)
> Luke, two remarks:
> 1. Should we split this task and budget into two parts since not all
> instructions are covered yet due to the fact these are not present in our
> repos?

hmm hmm ok yes. there are some other things need doing: moving eeverything
to PO9 is one of them. that's a big change, has to be done all at once.

> 2. You committed some updates on CSV/mdwn part, I'd be glad if you could
> join this little festival of life budget-wise. :-)

:) sure.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.