[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 741] bitmanip ALU implementation

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741

--- Comment #15 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> ---
so, again, to reiterate:

1) there are conventions that were created long ago and they are not
   up for debate or discussion.

2) not following those conventions will be confusing and cause massive
   disruption.

3) when i say "please do something in this specific and requested way"
   it is short-hand for:

   a) this was already decided a long time ago, it is not up for debate
   b) i haven't got time and neither have any of us to go over that again
   c) if there was a lengthy discussion it would conclude exactly what i asked
   d) therefore please don't argue, don't jeapordise timescales, just do it

now, i did in fact provide you with the basics of the explanations for
the decisions that had already been made.  these were in, at least:

* comment #5
* comment #7
* comment #12

you ignored those comments.  please do not ignore things, forcing me to
waste time repeating them again and again.  i have made it clear that it
is very disrespectful to ignore the Project Leader, and that it jeapordises
timescales.  we hav e been through the consequences of this type of
behaviour already.

please therefore re-read the comments and take them on board.

i have raised bug #745 as a sub-bug for OP_TERNARY: there are a large
number of sub-tasks (14 if a separate pipeline is used, or only around
7 if sharing with similar-profile shift_rot)

7 sub-tasks is still more than enough to justify a separate bugreport,
can we please therefore keep this one to specifically the individual
functions that get added (more high-level) so as to keep the number
of comments down

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.