[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 495] New: Add API to PowerISA spec simulation to properly handle [partially] undefined results in tests
bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org
bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org
Thu Sep 17 23:42:22 BST 2020
https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495
Bug ID: 495
Summary: Add API to PowerISA spec simulation to properly handle
[partially] undefined results in tests
Product: Libre-SOC's first SoC
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: CONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: ---
Component: Source Code
Assignee: lkcl at lkcl.net
Reporter: programmerjake at gmail.com
CC: libre-soc-bugs at lists.libre-soc.org,
programmerjake at gmail.com
NLnet milestone: ---
As mentioned in:
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=soc.git;a=blob;f=src/soc/fu/div/test/test_pipe_caller.py;h=9c4ba3feeceb834cfb87869d0c7d764660e74b64;hb=fe09321a98f193a629d873a8ea055cc72ba949ff#l14
The python simulation of the PowerISA specification needs to grow new API
interfaces to allow tests to correctly ignore cases where the PowerISA spec
doesn't actually specify which output values are correct.
I think the API should track undefined values at the bit level, allowing tests
to match the parts of the output that are specified, while knowing to ignore
the bits that aren't specified. A relatively easy way to do that is adding a
validity mask to SelectableInt and setting `undefined` to have all bits
invalid. We can probably assume that all non-bitwise operations can just
generate completely undefined results (or just raise an exception) if they
encounter partially undefined inputs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the libre-soc-bugs
mailing list