[Libre-soc-isa] [Bug 1089] feedback on OPF SVP64 RFC for "managment" instructions: ls008

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1089

Dmitry Selyutin <ghostmansd at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ghostmansd at gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Selyutin <ghostmansd at gmail.com> ---
Luke, could you, please, clarify, what's assumed here with "remove _RT and
_RA"? From the page I saw this:

Notation, Section 1.3.2
When destination register operands (RT, RS) are prefixed by a single underscore
(_RT, _RS) the variable also contains the contents of the instruction field.
This avoids confusion in pseudocode when a destination register is assigned (RT
<- x) but earlier it was the operand bits that were checked (if RT = 0).

I assume that we need to discard the underscore from pseudocode variables, is
it correct?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.