[Libre-soc-dev] Libre-soc-dev Digest, Vol 49, Issue 3

[Sable]

On 06/02/2024 06:12 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:

>
>
>
>     You would also have put the code under something permissive like
>     MIT license or w/e more than likely.
>
>
> That interestingly would mean, like apple no longer contributing back 
> BSD kernel patches, that commercial entities could take it.  So.. no 
> on MIT :)
>
> Appreciate the discussion, Sable.
>
> L.
>
If you do however ever make schematics for your processors, It might be 
good for schematics, using something more permissive.

This would be good so that BSDs good make their own drivers. But the 
software of course should be under a copyleft license for sure. I agree 
with you there 100%.

AGPL3 or GPL3 are both wise. :)

But you can tell me your thoughts.
>
> -- 
> ---
> geometry: without it life is pointless
> the fibonacci series: easy as 1 1 2 3
>