[Libre-soc-dev] State of some tasks needs clarification

[lkcl]

On Wednesday, August 16, 2023, Dmitry Selyutin <ghostmansd at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> 0. Luke, could you, please, update task_db state?


>
done


> Some tasks seem to
> be outdated.
> 1. 1054, 1056,


these need a writeup (by someone other than me)


>
1079, 1083, 1089 -- what's their state?


>  What's the goal
> when I can consider these done on my part?


i am no longer working on them. someone else will have to take over
and complete them.

2. 1035 needs support (or at least re-checking) for binutils. What'd
> be the right task to address it?


 one created under 1035.

3. 1063 is marked as resolved; I assume this means RFP for it can be
> submitted. Is this correct?


of course. you can see i submitted an RFP on 2023-06-22

4. 1119: comment #4 mentions there's plenty of budget to do that, but
> it still has no budget assigned. :-)


see parent  https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035 there is
EUR 7,000. someone (not me) has to decide how much is fair to
allocate to 11119 then action it and then run budget-sync to make sure
they did not destroy the Accounting / Audit / Financial Records.

5. 1003: we had a lot of plans concerning new visitors. At least
> binutils can be rewritten. But have we ever created tasks for these
> activities?


no that is something that, again, other people need to do and take
responsibility for.  cavatools is where the majority of tasks involving
use of visitors is.

basically everyone needs to properly read pretty much every bugreport
(like i used to do for many hours a day) and go over them, becoming
familiar with the tasks and available budgets.

l.