[Libre-soc-dev] git.libre-soc.org mesa repo branch

Cole Poirier colepoirier at gmail.com
Wed Sep 9 19:18:48 BST 2020

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:19 AM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
<lkcl at lkcl.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:47 PM vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think we should have waited a little bit.
> the transparency requirements of NLnet's "Privacy and Enhanced Trust"
> Grant need to be met, Vivek.  plus if someone else joins you and
> wishes to help out, "waiting" actively prevents and prohibits them
> from doing that, doesn't it?
> > Everything is visible and
> > accessible on
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/vivekvpandya/mesa/-/tree/libresoc_dev
> > Until I don't get LLVM jit wrangled all work is mostly labor, nothing much
> > smart.
> please understand: the "quality" or "status" should in no way be
> considered a deciding factor as to whether code should or should not
> be made available.  it should *always* be made available.   if code is
> not "pushed" within a few minutes of it being written and tested, this
> should be considered a "red flag".
> i've documented this on the HDL_workflow "development practices" page
> https://libre-soc.org/HDL_workflow/
> > Is anyone planning to add any code?
> if we can find other people to help, yes.  i'm doing two conference
> presentations on LibreSOC for next week so it is likely to happen
> soon.
> > Mostly that won't help until I get LLVM getting generated.
> >
> > I will push vk_format* files in some hours (Internet is down).
> are these auto-generated from a command? (if so they should not be
> added, merely the build instructions updated).
> > Now I don't
> > know if that will create a mess in the git repository Cole just created.
> it shouldn't - if it does, use "git push libresoc +{insert_branch}" to
> fix it (note the "+")
> you can either edit the .git/config file by hand (i do that all the
> time) or use some commands (which i don't know) to achieve the same
> effect:
> [remote "libresoc"]
>     url = gitolite3 at git.libre-riscv.org:/mesa
>     fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
> yes you can have two URL lines under [remote "master"] _or_ if you
> prefer you can have a separately-named remote... all in the same
> .git/config file.

Just a heads up, Luke, you only responded to vivek's mail but I do
need you to respond to mine too as it relates to what the main branch
of the repository should be named i.e. master or libresoc_dev.


More information about the Libre-soc-dev mailing list