colepoirier at gmail.com
Wed Dec 2 20:31:02 GMT 2020
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:19 PM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
<lkcl at lkcl.net> wrote:
> On 12/2/20, Cole Poirier <colepoirier at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I did read carefully, I just didn't guess right.
> right. do NOT take initiative and start wildly guessing. this is
> really serious: get it wrong and NLNet can get into serious trouble
> when audited.
> the task you were allocated is: fill in received / requested dates.
> nothing else.
> did i say do any other task?
> no i did not, so why on this critically important job are you doing
> "random" modifications to audited financial records?
> start to feel scared into taking this seriously and be stricter about
> whst you do and do not do, yet?
> adding the date moves things in the autogenerated markdown so it
> starts to look like the handedited versions.
> we do this in incremental steps ok?
Sorry, I didn't realize from this statement "updating records so that
the autogenerated mdwn files correspond to the manual records." that
that meant ONLY fill in dates. I mistakenly thought that the task was
to edit the bugzilla entries to correspond to the budget-sync results.
My apologies. I genuinely did not understand the parameters, even
though I read the instructions very carefully and am taking this
*VERY* seriously. My crucial misunderstanding was thinking that the
records to be updated were the fields in bugzilla that produced errors
in the budget-sync. I clearly did not properly understand what was
implied by the statement "updating records so that the autogenerated
mdwn files correspond to the manual records.", and I still don't
though I see I have just received an email from you with instructions.
I will make sure I properly understand before beginning my task this
time. Again, apologies for messing up financial records.
More information about the Libre-soc-dev