[Libre-soc-isa] [Bug 1048] OPF ISA External RFC ls011 - Fixed and Floating point LD/ST-with-update EXT2xx instructions

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1048

Andrey Miroshnikov <andrey at technepisteme.xyz> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |andrey at technepisteme.xyz

--- Comment #23 from Andrey Miroshnikov <andrey at technepisteme.xyz> ---
Luke, I added inline imports for:
fixedload, fixedstore, fpload, fpstore, pifixedload, pifixedstore

https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=1b25b0de237d38e761faf5d7716d0a8f3313f8f8

I noticed that some instruction entries already present in ls011.mdwn have an
additional table for the instruction form.

See for example lwzup, which has an D-Form table:
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=blob;f=openpower/sv/rfc/ls011.mdwn;h=9137b5d2778d420e53b79c31397ad10ed447b5ee;hb=1b25b0de237d38e761faf5d7716d0a8f3313f8f8#l377

While the inline import doesn't have the D-Form table:
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=openpower-isa.git;a=blob;f=openpower/isa/pifixedload.mdwn;h=0418b1cd4e89ec350842d373190343fcd1c72893;hb=HEAD#l171

Do the duplicate entries in ls011.mdwn need to be removed (since the inline
files replace them)?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.