[Libre-soc-isa] [Bug 1017] ISA WG RFC for binary and ternary bitops

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1017

--- Comment #3 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> ---
> TODO: should we use imm7 instead of imm8 for `ternlogi`? This wouldn't make the decoder significantly more complex, since the immediate doesn't affect wether or not the instruction is defined. <https://libre-soc.org/openpower/sv/bitmanip/ternlogi_simplification_experiment/>

i already said no and i already explained why not.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.