[Libre-soc-isa] [Bug 1052] OPF RFC ls012 writeup: list of RFCs to be proposed to OPF ISA WG

bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org
Mon Apr 10 08:48:42 BST 2023


Andrey Miroshnikov <andrey at technepisteme.xyz> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |andrey at technepisteme.xyz

--- Comment #2 from Andrey Miroshnikov <andrey at technepisteme.xyz> ---
Spotted a typo.

In the Bitmanip LUT2/3 section (page 3), the wording of
"SFFS needs to be stand-alone on its own merits and not "punished" should an
implementor choose not to implement any aspect of PackedSIMD VSX."

"punished" may come out a little strong to certain parties. Now I may be
finicky, but you know how vigilant in regards to wording we need to be.

In the Tables section (page 4), "mutually exclusively" doesn't sound right to

Initially I couldn't find the explanation for the "cost" column, but then
realised the description calls it "XO Cost". I suggest the actual table column
is also called "XO Cost" to reduce ambiguity.

Another issue I found is that entries under PO1 column are "??" for LD/ST Post
Increment, though that might be a problem with the pdf generation.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the Libre-SOC-ISA mailing list