[Libre-soc-dev] Subject Access Request Disclosure 5965

[lkcl]

without prejudice and reminding you of your obligation under the autism act
I am reminding you, Hampshire county council, that the SAR is incomplete.

firstly, AKIM's handwritten notes are missing: the meeting appx 2 days
prior to being violently assaulted at the premises where I was tortured
almost to death.

secondly, you have redacted people who have been provided my information:
the request was for ALL information and that includes the full names and
contact details of people with whom you have discussed me. not, "those
people within the county" - ALL people.


thirdly I remind you that as I have been tortured, and have been abused to
such a violent extent that it caused significant brain damage, combined
with autism you absolutely cannot place me at risk by failing to
communicate with me in an "unsafe" fashion.

"unsafe" means "further torture by failing to actively listen", as well as
making catastrophic mistaken assumptions in any kind of communication.

please indicate in writing explicitly and in simple language that you
understand what torture is, and that you have communications protocols in
place that you *WILL* follow, for dealing with autistic individuals *and*
interacting with people who have been tortured.

the protocols should summarize as:
1. ASK SIMPLE DIRECT QUESTIONS
2. under NO CIRCUMSTANCES make assumptive-close statements.

an incredibly simple way to do that is to say "I believe X to be the case:
IS THIS CORRECT?"

if you write simply "I believe X to be the case" and it is a false
statement you risk putting me into deep shock (a criminal offense),
continuing the torture (which is a criminal offense) and placing me at risk
of death through anaphylaxis caused by the shock (also a criminal offense).

I *cannot risk* reading your last response as I have no idea if you have
followed Autism / Torture communications protocol.

so let me offer you the (one) opportunity to retract your response and to
indicate to me that you intend to ask CLARIFYING QUESTIONS instead. your
covering letter by email with your response I REQUIRE it to indicate a
summary that you have followed the above two steps.

in essence the level of criminality within your organisation is
inexcusable: several members of your staff *are* going to be prosecuted,
and you *are* going to help prosecute those people whom you have evidence
of their criminal activity. if you DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY then I REQUIRE
that you ASK QUESTIONS until you do understand why.

and you will do so in a way that does not result in criminal assault or
further criminal torture.

l.