From luke.leighton at gmail.com Mon Mar 3 20:36:28 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 20:36:28 +0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] PDAL APPLICATION In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: WITHOUT PREJUDICE i refer you to my prior complaints to which i have either not received a response or the response has been abusive and is psychological torture. i have told you many times that Atherley House were abusive, misdiagnosed and misreported medical conditions that i do not have. i have told you many times that i do not have medical conditions that require declaration. i have told you many times that forced signing of a form with a grammatical error, and forcing me to make a false declaration of a medical condition that i do not have is a criminal offense on your part: it is called "suborning to make a false statement". i have told you that this is a criminal offense and yet you continue down an abusive path. i have requested many times the restoration of my illegally and criminally revoked driving license. why are you not listening? why are you continuing to engage in psychological torture? when are you going to respond adequately to my THITD complaint? i request require and demand the restoration of my 1997 driving license and adequate compensation for the abuse torture and damages and losses you have caused. as per my THIRD complaint - to which you have failed to respond or acknowledge - you are prohibited under the Autism Act 2009 from contacting me by any method other than email, except to post my restored 1997 driving license. On Monday, March 3, 2025, Sharon Louise Davies < SharonLouise.Davies at dvla.gov.uk> wrote: > Good Morning Mr Leighton > > > > Please find attached the application pack for a driving assessment and PDAL licence. > > > > Please note that should you accept this offer, the physical PDAL licence cannot be sent via email and will be posted to you. > > > > Many thanks > > Ms Sharon Davies > > > > > > Sharon Davies > > Administration Officer > > Drivers Medical Group | D7 Team 57 PDAL| DVLA | Swansea | SA67JL > > > > > > Gallwch ddewis derbyn nodiadau atgoffa treth cerbyd drwy negeseuon testun neu e-byst. Ewch i: gov.uk/dvla/cyfrif > > You can now choose to receive vehicle tax reminders by text or email. Go to: gov.uk/dvla/account > > X: @dvlagovuk | Facebook: dvlagovuk | YouTube: dvlagov > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > Correspondents should note that all communications to DVLA may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for lawful purposes. > > Please visit www.gov.uk/browse/driving for government information on all aspects of motoring, ranging from log books and driving licences to driving tests and vehicle tax. > ************************************************************************************ From luke.leighton at gmail.com Mon Mar 3 21:08:43 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 21:08:43 +0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] GMC Your enquiry - E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: i have been psychologically tortured, first by 16 years domestic violence and then by the NHS. you allocated a transcription interview process in order to help overcome the effects of the torture. then instead you allocated fergus. fergus has not been given time to help me. the psychological torture was - is - still ongoing UHS has been dangerously abusive, destroying evidence and obstructing justice. the police do not understand the danger i have been placed in. the police have even said "because no budget case closed". the police have even said, just like you, "go back to the people who abused you". when trying to get evidence to the police i have been so traumatised that watching it even by accident is so distressing that it places me at risk. this is a clear sign of having been tortured. during the rare times where i was interviewed by the police i ended up in shock so badly that i required paramedic callouts. it then took days to weeks to recover. there are now over 2,000 videos and photographs. VID_0850.3gp and VID_0851.3gp have Dr Lam refusing to provide her GMC number when requested (she said "i will write it down" then fails to do so), then accuses me of faking medical symptoms. this put me into deep shock. she then proceeds to put me into further shock with her aggressive attitude, placing me under time pressure. VID_0851 shows me getting more and more distraught as the effects of the shock start to sink in (i have all the symptoms of Chronic Adrenal Fatigue Syndrome, from the Domestic Violence) i remind her of the autism act 2009: she does not acknowledge it, nor ask what it is. just like you she asks no questions. there is no effort on her part to offer any kind of support as i get more and more distraught. there is no empathy whatsoever. for someone who has been tortured in a Domestic Violence relationship, a total lack of empathy is the worst thing that anyone could do. you can hear even through the deep distress that i remind Dr Law that i have requested a neurophysiologist referral. she makes absolutely no effort to acknowledge the request. i mention that i have a massive amount of video and photographic evidence. she makes abolutely no effort to request to see it. after six minutes i am sobbing in deep distress. as she sits there in total silence i realise that she is a danger to my well-being, gather my belongings as best i can, difficult as it is to see through tears that will not stop, and make my way out using the walls for support. i do not understand why you make no effort to understand what has taken place. On Monday, March 3, 2025, FPD Decisions wrote: > Dear Mr Leighton > > > > Thank you for your emails of 13 and 15 January 2025. I am very sorry for the delayed response, it has been a busy period for the department. > > > > I am sorry that you are disappointed with our decision. The purpose of an investigation is to determine if or to what extent we need to restrict doctors from working. I can understand why you are disappointed that we have not made the decision you were hoping for, from reading your correspondence you have clearly been through a difficult time. > > > > This does not mean that we are dismissing the issues you have brought to us and I do appreciate how strongly you feel about this matter. However due to the focus of our powers, this is unfortunately not something we can assist you with at this time. Please be assured that our position is in no way intended to trivialise your concerns in any way. > > > > I can confirm that we made contact with the Police to enquire as to whether there was an open investigation into the concerns that you have raised. > > > > I understand that you would like us to ask you questions, however there are no questions that we need to ask you as the Assistant Registrar (decision maker) has made their decision. > > > > Other organisations you can contact > > We believe that the issues you have raised would be better considered at a local level through the NHS complaints process. This is because local providers are often better placed to provide the explanation or apology that a patient might require. Local providers are also in a better position to assess whether or not there are any wider issues of concern that need to be addressed. > > Therefore, you may wish to raise your concerns about your GPs with the practice manager at the surgery if you have not already done so. Or alternatively, if you prefer, you may wish to consider escalating these to your local Integrated Care Board (ICB), the body that is responsible for the provision of health services in your area. You can find your local ICB using the following link: https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/find-your-local-integrated-care-board/. > > > > We understand you have raised your concerns about the unidentified A&E doctor with the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust which we consider to be the most appropriate course of action to take. You may also wish to raise your concerns about Dr Thagadur with the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust who you can contact at: > > > > Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust > > Concerns and Complaints Team > > 7 Sterne Road > > Tatchbury Mount > > Calmore > > Southampton > > SO40 2RZ > > Tel: 023 8231 1200 > > Email: complaints at southernhealth.nhs.uk > > Website: https://hiowhealthcare.nhs.uk/your-care-and-information/how-to-raise-a-concern > > > > If you are not happy with the healthcare providers response the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) may be able to offer you their advice and assistance. The role of the PHSO differs from that of the GMC and enables them to undertake independent investigations into complaints where the NHS have not acted properly or fairly or have provided a poor service. They can be contacted at: > > > > The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman > > Citygate > > Mosley Street > > Manchester > > M2 3HQ > > Tel: 0345 015 4033 > Email: phso.enquiries at ombudsman.org.uk > Website: ombudsman.org.uk > > > > Should the NHS or PHSO find that there have been failures on the part of any doctor, then please do contact us again providing us with the full investigation findings. This is so we can consider what, if any, action might be required on our part in respect of their registration. > > > > In your complaint correspondence, you have also raised concerns about your overall healthcare experience which we recognise you are unhappy with. You have also raised concerns about other individuals, which may include healthcare professionals who are not registered with the GMC. Unfortunately, these do not appear to be issues we can assist you with. This is because we can only consider concerns about individual doctors on our list of registered medical practitioners. > > > > You may wish to raise your concerns with the appropriate healthcare provider or the PHSO as detailed above. If you believe there has been any criminal activity, you should report this to the Police. > > Please note we cannot contact these organisations for you, act on your behalf or become involved in any of their processes. > > Reviewing our decision > > Once a decision has been made by Assistant Registrar it cannot be updated or changed, but if you remain unhappy with our decision then we do have a Rule 12 team, and their role is to review decisions that have been made. There are two instances in which we will consider reviewing the decision. They are when we have reason to believe that: > > the decision may be materially flawed, and/or > > there is new information which may have led to a different decision. > > We’re not able to review a decision solely because you disagree with it. Even if one or both of these grounds are met, it must also be in the public interest and/or necessary for the protection of the public. As a result, the threshold for a review is relatively high. I have attached a FAQ factsheet which provides more detail on the process. If you’d like to request a review, you should put this in writing, ideally using the attached WORD document, and then you can send it directly to the Rule 12 review team. Their email address is rule12 at gmc-uk.org. Alternatively I would be happy to send this to the Rule 12 team upon receipt of your completed questionnaire. > > Our Independent Support Service > > We recognise that raising concerns about a doctor can be a stressful experience. If you feel that you would like any support, you might wish to speak to Independent support service (ISS). They are a free, confidential and independent telephone support service provided by Victim Support. You can contact them by calling 0300 303 3709 and find more information on their service here: www.victimsupport.org.uk/gmcnmc. > > I hope that this information is helpful. > > Yours sincerely > > > > Helen Barratt > FTP Liaison Officer > General Medical Council > 3 Hardman Street, Manchester, M3 3AW > > Direct Dial: 0161 549 0486 > > Email: fpddecisions at gmc-uk.org > > Website: www.gmc-uk.org > > > > Please note I work Monday- Thursday > > > > > > > > > > > > > > General Medical Council > > We work with doctors, physician associates (PAs), anaesthesia associates (AAs), those they care for and other stakeholders to support good, safe patient care across the UK. We set the standards doctors, PAs, AAs and their educators need to meet, and help them achieve them. If there are concerns these standards may not be met or that public confidence in doctors, PAs or AAs may be at risk, we can investigate, and take action if needed. > > This email may contain privileged or confidential information which should only be used for the purpose for which it has been sent. > > If you are not the addressee or have received this email in error, please do not read, print, re-transmit, store or act in reliance on it or any attachments. Please email the sender and then immediately delete it. > > The General Medical Council is a charity registered in England and Wales (1089278) and in Scotland (SC037750) > > You are welcome to contact us in Welsh. We will respond in Welsh, without this causing additional delay. > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Y Cyngor Meddygol Cyffredinol > > Rydym yn gweithio gyda meddygon, cymdeithion meddygol (PA), cymdeithion anesthesia (AA), y rhai y maent yn gofalu amdanynt a rhanddeiliaid eraill i gefnogi gofal da a diogel i gleifion ledled y DU. Rydym yn gosod y safonau y mae angen i feddygon, cymdeithion meddygol, cymdeithion anesthesia a’u haddysgwyr eu bodloni, ac yn eu helpu i’w cyrraedd. Os oes pryderon na fydd y safonau hyn yn cael eu bodloni o bosibl, neu y gallai hyder y cyhoedd mewn meddygon, cymdeithion meddygol neu gymdeithion anesthesia fod mewn perygl, gallwn ymchwilio, a chymryd camau os oes angen. > > Efallai fod y neges e-bost hon yn cynnwys gwybodaeth freiniol neu gyfrinachol, y dylid ei defnyddio at y diben cafodd ei hanfon ar ei gyfer yn unig. > > Os nad chi sydd i fod i'w dderbyn, neu os ydych chi wedi cael yr e-bost hwn mewn camgymeriad, peidiwch â’i ddarllen, ei argraffu, ei ail-drosglwyddo, ei storio na gweithredu gan ddibynnu ar y neges nac unrhyw atodiadau. Anfonwch yr e-bost at yr anfonwr ac yna ei ddileu ar unwaith. > > Mae’r Cyngor Meddygol Cyffredinol yn elusen gofrestredig yng Nghymru a Lloegr (1089278) ac yn yr Alban (SC037750) > > Mae croeso i chi gysylltu â ni yn Gymraeg. Byddwn ni’n ymateb yn Gymraeg, heb i hyn achosi oedi ychwanegol. > From luke.leighton at gmail.com Tue Mar 4 00:38:23 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 00:38:23 +0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] GMC Your enquiry - E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: you realise that by saying "go contact the NHS" you've said "go back to your RAPIST and get them to admit they're wrong?" how can you sit there and tell me that you contacted the police, but you didn't bother to ask me if you had all of the evidence and didn't bother to check with me if you even understood the evidence or even had it correct? failures like this - failure of organisations that are supposed to be responsible and supposed to protect people from abuse, maiming, and death - keep happening. one stupid police officer even ended up inventing the name of a criminal that doesn't exist, and fabricated statements that i never made. i was so shocked i just couldn't go through it to correct the mistakes. and why are you contacting me directly instead of reaching out to me through the ADVOCATE THAT YOUR VERY ORGANISATION APPOINTED ME? From luke.leighton at gmail.com Sat Mar 8 14:28:24 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 14:28:24 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 1. under no circumstances is "Tina" to contact me. 2. please acknowledge my compaint regarding "Tina's" Obstruction of Justice. the rest are part of the abuse and torture by the NHS 3. please explain why when i ordered critical dietary items because you failed completely to talk to me despite requests in writing, that some of the items were seized DESPITE being on an NHS Prescribed List for Ketogenic Diet for autistic individuals. 4. please explain why written requests - to return the seized CRITICAL MEDICAL DIETARY items - were ignored. 5. please explain why, when Dr Jones ORDERED THE RETURN of those items, your "doctors" FAILED TO PROVIDE THEM. 6. please explain why when i have daily records of meals eaten (and not eaten due to no suitable autism dietary food being avilable) and clearly have had to order FROM PERSONAL FUNDS food online, you have lied about meeting my dietary requirements whilst i was being tortured? fergus this is another instance of negligence on the part of the "doctors". items seized: * MCT Oil (an absolutely essential source of energy for the brain, for anyone with autism) * Ashwaganda root (biofermented) * sports-related Electrolyte drops -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Order Details.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 227486 bytes Desc: not available URL: From luke.leighton at gmail.com Thu Mar 13 00:15:16 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:15:16 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: <544C202F32F6480B8EB58C94168B0A831DB9332E7AFE@MHAENQUIRIES.CQC.ORG.UK> References: <544C202F32F6480B8EB58C94168B0A831DB9332E7AFE@MHAENQUIRIES.CQC.ORG.UK> Message-ID: hi turi, thank you for your clarifying questions - at last someone is communicating and respecting that autistic people who have been abused and tortuted need help to communicate. i am deeply grateful. to answer (please do again ask questions) 1. i don't know if it's been raised, because you are the first person since tina stated (not exact words) "the police are OBVIOUSLY dealing with matters THEREFORE i am shutting down all further communication with you, CQC MHA investigation closed". there was no effort made by tina to ASK QUESTIONS as to whether the police had even taken my (second) Crime Report seriously, after the first was closed DUE TO POLICE BUDGETARY RESTRICTIONS. this put me into shock (an assault due to medical conditions) because i expect you to work WITH me, to provide the police with reports! 2. the process whilst the CQC telephone staff were absolutely amazing and explained things clearly, when it came to *actioning* - passing on the formal complaints - this part has gone catastrophically badly in several ways EITHER: a) tina neglected to pass on the full details OR: b) NHS Trust *DELIBERATELY* - committing the criminal offense of Obstruction of Justice in the process ignored aspects that they knew were negligence. (there are simply too many of these to list, but one is that IN WRITING they claim not to have received video evidence when i have in fact passed formally the same to you, as youtube links) c) NHS trust has begun accusing me of lying, which is itself an assault (criminal offense) as the shock of their accusation results in a frighteningly quick catastrophic chain of medical consequences which i have well-documented with video evidence something close to a hundred occurrences, now. d) tina, your staff member, i warned you many months ago that she is showing signs of being herself completely traumatised just from listening to me relate the harm that's been done. this is down to lack of training and support at the CQC that has left me as "debris" in its wake. tina has *not* been able to help protect me from the lying, evasion, ongoing abuse by the NHS "trust". 3. TheAdvocacyPeople fail in their duty of care and responsibility by stepping away when criminal activity takes place. where the NHS Trust is engaging in Obstruction of Justice by evading responding, outright lying, and accusing me of lying DESPITE TIMESTAMPED VIDEO AND PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE, this *PROHIBITS* T.A.P from protecting me from the very same Obstructions of Justice and exposes me to further shock, which again leads to a Crime of non-contact GBH being committed. 4. i did inform you that there are approximately 5-10 complaint items *PER DAY EACH DAY FOR FOURTEEN DAYS*. these are DOCUMENTED WITH EVIDENCE in 95% of cases. AH attempted (successfully, three times, violently assaulting me in two cases, and a third i was in life threatening medical distress for 6 and a half hours on the floor and in no way medically capable of stopping them) to remove recording devices i used to capture their negligence and criminal activities, and i had to ask my friend to smuggle in additional devices as well as secretly passed him copies of the evidence in case my recordings, notes and photographic evidence was seized and destroyed. this INCLUDES timestamped photographs of dozens of notes IN WRITING HANDED TO THE STAFF, who then failed to take them seriously "Because Delusional Psychotic, Must Be Faking It" one of these notes warns that i had blood on a tissue, and urgently required a doctor. i took a photograph of the blood on the tissue, to demonstrate it was not fake. i did not receive a response. no doctor was called. "Because Delusional". it goes on and on like this, Turi. 90 minutes EVERY NIGHT of Anaphylactic shock caused by UNSUPERVISED forced ingestion of a known-toxic substance. notes of the effects AND notes critically urgently requesting a doctor IGNORED. "Because Delusional" you have to understand that i am basically lucky to be alive, and that i was seriously maimed and tortured by people whose negligence is so breathtakingly extensive that i am having severe difficulty getting it across to people. they were TOLD "luke is CLEARLY delusional": they didn't listen to a word i said, made no effort to ascertain the extent of the medical damage that combined autism and domestic violence can cause (chronic adrenal fatigue), which includes SEVERE delays in processing of information, organisational difficulties, planning difficulties, memory recal! problems and other neurodegenerative effects NONE OF WHICH THEY ASKED ME ABOUT IN ANY WAY during the 25 minute "assessment" (yes, the audio recording is 25 minutes NOT NINETY AS FALSELY STATED BY NHS TRUST). consequently their superficial "assessment" was catastrophically negligent, and given that i was there by deception, having planned a completely different conversation (due to the autism and total exhaustion) i was UNABLE to answer their UNEXPECTED questions and only noticed how insidious they were after being strong enough, months later, to review the audio recording. (which NHS Trust failed to acknowledge and review when i gave them the youtube link) and it is blindingly obvious to me that both Lindsay and the NHS Southern Trust will do absolutely anything and everything within their power to evade admitting fault. why? because if they even admit one thing, they lose their jobs, they lose their pensions, and they get a criminal record. ... and yet i have been advised BY THE POLICE to go back to these criminals and to get them to admit fault. without help of any kind. including from some of your own staff members, i am so sorry to have to remind you. you'll have to pass on my complaints to them, and you'll also have to re-read everything and go over the things that they've failed to respond to. i am not doing that - it was traumatic enough relaying things to you just the once. but here is a hint: everything that would mean they go to jail for negligence, they fail to acknowledge. l. On Wednesday, March 12, 2025, MHA Enquiries wrote: > Dear Mr Leighton. > > Please can you confirm whether the below and attached have been raised directly as a formal complaint with Antelope House? If so did you receive a response? > > As previously explained to you, CQC does not provide an advocacy service, we appreciate your complaints are numerous and you are seeking support with them. If this complaint has not been raised with the care provider and responded to we can send it to them on your behalf for them to respond to you directly copying CQC into their response to you. > > Kind Regards > > Miss Turi Maddison > Mental Health Act Senior Complaints Officer > Care Quality Commission > T: 03000 616161 > E: MHAenquries at cqc.org.uk > > The Care Quality Commission is the independent regulator of all health and adult social care in England. www.cqc.org.uk. For general enquiries, call the National Customer Service Centre (NCSC) on 03000 616161 or email enquiries at cqc.org.uk > Personal data is processed in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and relevant data protection law. Information on the processing of personal data by CQC can be found at http://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/our-policies/privacy-statement > Statutory requests for information made under access to information legislation such as the GDPR and the Freedom of Information Act 2000 should be sent to: information.access at cqc.org.uk > > ------------------- Original Message ------------------- > From: lkcl ; > Received: Sat Mar 08 2025 14:29:03 GMT+0000 (Greenwich Mean Time) > To: MHAGEN ; MHAenquiries at cqc.org.uk < mhaenquiries at cqc.org.uk>; > Cc: f.harrison at pohwer.net; libre-soc-dev at lists.libre-soc.org; > Subject: Re: Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES > > 1. under no circumstances is "Tina" to contact me. > > 2. please acknowledge my compaint regarding "Tina's" Obstruction > of Justice. > > the rest are part of the abuse and torture by the NHS > > 3. please explain why when i ordered critical dietary items > because you failed completely to talk to me despite requests > in writing, that some of the items were seized DESPITE > being on an NHS Prescribed List for Ketogenic Diet for > autistic individuals. > > 4. please explain why written requests - to return the seized > CRITICAL MEDICAL DIETARY items - were ignored. > > 5. please explain why, when Dr Jones ORDERED THE RETURN of those > items, your "doctors" FAILED TO PROVIDE THEM. > > 6. please explain why when i have daily records of meals > eaten (and not eaten due to no suitable autism dietary > food being avilable) and clearly have had to order > FROM PERSONAL FUNDS food online, you have lied > about meeting my dietary requirements whilst i was > being tortured? > > fergus this is another instance of negligence on the part of > the "doctors". items seized: > > * MCT Oil (an absolutely essential source of energy for the > brain, for anyone with autism) > > * Ashwaganda root (biofermented) > > * sports-related Electrolyte drops > > -------------- The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed to or used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If this email is received in error, please notify us immediately by clicking "Reply" and delete the email. Please note that neither the Care Quality Commission nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the Care Quality Commission. Information on how the Care Quality Commission processes personal data is available here http://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/our-policies/privacy-statement From luke.leighton at gmail.com Thu Mar 13 05:20:27 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 05:20:27 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: <544C202F32F6480B8EB58C94168B0A831DB9332E7AFE@MHAENQUIRIES.CQC.ORG.UK> Message-ID: turi, an afterthought / clarification (welcome btw to the fragmentation caused by the combination of autism and chronic adrenal fatigue syndrome from domestic violence, i sincerely apologise but with zero support from any service of any kind it is what it is) to be clear: yes i am giving permission to pass on complaints that tina neglected to pass on, HOWEVER: please *filter* them down to the basics, do *not* pass on anything that could "tip them off" that they have been caught lying and Obstructing Justice. the aim should be to catch them making more mistakes l. From luke.leighton at gmail.com Fri Mar 14 07:55:29 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 07:55:29 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thursday, March 13, 2025, MHA Enquiries wrote: > > Good Morning Mr Leighton. > > thank you for your email. emails plural. please confirm that you received emails PLURAL. > > CQC can forward your complaint to the provider, if they have not previously received it and responded to it we will ask them to do so. they are failing to respond in full. you need to establish why. this is your direct responsibility. > They will contact you directly and copy CQC in. CQC does expect all complaints to have been responded to by the care provider before any further actions by CQC will be considered. they have failed - deliberately - to respond. your responsibility is to ascertain why. i am too deeply psychologically traumatised and frightened by their ongoing abuse to help you sort through the massive list. it has been traumatising enough to go over the events once, for documenting them: you cannot expect me to go over them again and again and again, as this is further abuse and torture. > With this in mind please confirm if you still with the complaint to be forwarded to the Trust? complaints PLURAL which it is your responsibility to identify which they have and have not responded to, and which Tina has failed to pass on. please follow my explicit instructions given to you yesterday. > I must stress, CQC is not investigating this complaint relating to the amazon order or any complaint for you at this time. why not? i have been tortured, forced repeatedly to ingest a toxic substance knowing full well that doing so would result in 90 minutes of life-threatening anaphylaxis and other extreme symptoms. i still have nightmares and break down sobbing, which often triggers anaphylactic shock, placing me at risk of death each time. > We have previously advised the CQC does not provide an advocacy service and if you need assistance with the handling of your many complaints you would need to seek this support as CQC cannot provide this to you. i have already told you that there is zero support available for people in my position where significant criminal activity including torture and assault and significant criminal negligence has occurred. you are beginning to frighten me as it is becoming clear that you also are not listening. > Kind Regards > > Miss Turi Maddison > Mental Health Act Senior Complaints Officer > Care Quality Commission > T: 03000 616161 > E: MHAenquries at cqc.org.uk > > The Care Quality Commission is the independent regulator of all health and adult social care in England. www.cqc.org.uk. For general enquiries, call the National Customer Service Centre (NCSC) on 03000 616161 or email enquiries at cqc.org.uk > Personal data is processed in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and relevant data protection law. Information on the processing of personal data by CQC can be found at http://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/our-policies/privacy-statement > Statutory requests for information made under access to information legislation such as the GDPR and the Freedom of Information Act 2000 should be sent to: information.access at cqc.org.uk > > > ------------------- Original Message ------------------- > From: lkcl ; > Received: Thu Mar 13 2025 05:20:29 GMT+0000 (Greenwich Mean Time) > To: MHAGEN ; MHAenquiries at cqc.org.uk < mhaenquiries at cqc.org.uk>; > Cc: iwan.blann at hampshire.pnn.police.uk; f.harrison at pohwer.net; info at theadvocacypeople.org.uk; libre-soc-dev at lists.libre-soc.org; > Subject: Re: Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES > > turi, an afterthought / clarification (welcome btw to > the fragmentation caused by the combination of autism > and chronic adrenal fatigue syndrome from domestic > violence, i sincerely apologise but with zero support > from any service of any kind it is what it is) > > to be clear: yes i am giving permission to pass on > complaints that tina neglected to pass on, HOWEVER: > > please *filter* them down to the basics, do *not* pass on > anything that could "tip them off" that they have been caught > lying and Obstructing Justice. > > the aim should be to catch them making more mistakes > > l. > -------------- The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed to or used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If this email is received in error, please notify us immediately by clicking "Reply" and delete the email. Please note that neither the Care Quality Commission nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the Care Quality Commission. Information on how the Care Quality Commission processes personal data is available here http://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/our-policies/privacy-statement From luke.leighton at gmail.com Fri Mar 14 14:55:01 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:55:01 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: turi, regarding the seized medical dietary supplements (which you can see there is evidence that they were delivered), can i suggest asking in the following way: why were medical dietary supplements seized and not returned as instructed? do not mention Dr Jone's clear instructions to the criminally negligent THAGADUR. let them write up excuses, then compare that against what actually happened. they have already lied in writing that they "met my medical dietary needs" - fact is they did nothing of the sort, and i meticulously documented every piece of food that i ate, including the quantity and the time. but do *not* reveal that fact to them. l. From luke.leighton at gmail.com Fri Mar 14 15:21:07 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:21:07 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: actually, turi, i mentioned this before: i starved for the first two days. with no introduction whatsoever (because they were running on a skeleton crew over the bank holiday, with minimal agency staff and outside-contracted junior doctors) it was at least a day before i even knew there was a canteen, as i was only able to deduce its existence (and the opening times) by the fact that a few actual patients would bring food into Saxon Ward at certain times, in takeaway containers. it was also not explained to me that permission could be sought to leave the ward in order to *REACH* the canteen. only after two days of observing actual patients go through what was normally a locked door next to the office did i get enough courage to attempt the same thing myself. on being surprised that nobody stopped me, i watched people turn into an area where others had come out with food trays, and DISCOVERED a canteen existed. i was then completely dismayed to find "standard fare" of non-ketogenic non-autistic-suitable food (chips, pasta, rice) and that's when i wrote the note (and photographed it) to request that my dietary needs be met (they never were, which is why the meticulous documentation of what i ate, and when, is so crucial). as a result of this negligence i starved for two days, before my friend smuggled in some food supplies from my motorhome on one of his visits. eventually i worked out that i could request salad from the Cook for lunch and dinner, and i was "permitted" two pieces of fruit each morning. i also would grab as many marmite pats as possible, but there were some mornings where they ran out. (marmite is high in B vitamins, i eat between 5-10 grams A DAY) actual hot meals: two, i believe. one chili con carne, around day 12, the other a fry-up (egg, bacon, mushroom) which i was getting desperate and had to ignore that it was cooked in vegetable oil (inflammatory-inducing) you need to understand Turi that AH has one of the worst reputations in the country. i made friends in southampton who related similar stories of neglect and abuse. and with the persistent lying, it is just as obvious that NHS SH Trust knows this full well. l. From luke.leighton at gmail.com Sat Mar 15 15:42:50 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 15:42:50 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: <4CD4EC9D3DD5439BB5FA90C89F97C3271DB94F4BDC1F@MHAENQUIRIES.CQC.ORG.UK> References: <4CD4EC9D3DD5439BB5FA90C89F97C3271DB94F4BDC1F@MHAENQUIRIES.CQC.ORG.UK> Message-ID: On Friday, March 14, 2025, MHA Enquiries wrote: > Dear Mr Leighton. > > Your complaint relating to items you ordered whilst you were a patient on the ward being seized has been sent to the Trust. > > If they have not previously investigated and responded to it we have instructed them to initiate their formal complaints procedure. The Trust will contact you directly. > > CQC is not investigating this item at this time. Turi: you really should have asked me more explicitly, and discussed it with me more clearly, due to the autism combined with the chronic adrenal fatigue caused by 16 years Domestic Violence. what you are effectively saying - just as the police also said - is that having been RAPED "I must go back to my RAPIST and quotes discuss quotes their RAPING of me directly with THEM". does that *in any way* sound like a safe thing to do, given that they have violated the Autism Act 2009 Statutory requirements *and then lied about it*? why are you not listening to me? this is the fifth or sixth time of repeating: the "Trust" are not in any way "safe" and are doing everything they can to evade admitting responsibility. please ACKNOWLEDGE what i have written. you also fail to explicitly acknowledge as i requested receipt of emails PLURAL. you are scaring me, Turi, which places me at serious health risk. HELP me. for god's sake. HELP ME. please LISTEN > Kind Regards > > Miss Turi Maddison > Mental Health Act Senior Complaints Officer > Care Quality Commission > T: 03000 616161 > E: MHAenquries at cqc.org.uk > > > ------------------- Original Message ------------------- > From: lkcl ; > Received: Fri Mar 14 2025 14:55:06 GMT+0000 (Greenwich Mean Time) > To: MHAGEN ; MHAenquiries at cqc.org.uk < mhaenquiries at cqc.org.uk>; > Cc: info at theadvocacypeople.org.uk; f.harrison at pohwer.net; iwan.blann at hampshire.pnn.police.uk; libre-soc-dev at lists.libre-soc.org; > Subject: Re: Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES > > turi, > > regarding the seized medical dietary supplements (which you > can see there is evidence that they were delivered), can > i suggest asking in the following way: > > why were medical dietary supplements seized and not > returned as instructed? > > do not mention Dr Jone's clear instructions to the criminally > negligent THAGADUR. > > let them write up excuses, then compare that against what > actually happened. > > they have already lied in writing that they "met my medical > dietary needs" - fact is they did nothing of the sort, and > i meticulously documented every piece of food that i ate, > including the quantity and the time. > > but do *not* reveal that fact to them. > > l. > > -------------- The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed to or used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If this email is received in error, please notify us immediately by clicking "Reply" and delete the email. Please note that neither the Care Quality Commission nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the Care Quality Commission. Information on how the Care Quality Commission processes personal data is available here http://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/our-policies/privacy-statement From luke.leighton at gmail.com Sat Mar 15 15:55:36 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 15:55:36 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: <4CD4EC9D3DD5439BB5FA90C89F97C3271DB94F4BDC1F@MHAENQUIRIES.CQC.ORG.UK> Message-ID: so BEFORE passing on my message which contained information that was ONLY FOR YOU THE CQC, not for the RAPISTS KNOWN AS the "Trust", i was trying to work WITH you to develop a question approach that would lead, very obviously, into catching them lying blatantly. you've just destroyed an opportunity to do that. can you please NOT DO THAT AGAIN? this is enough of a dangerously traumatising experience to have to recall the events that led me to being maimed and placed at risk of death from Anaphylaxis over TEN TIMES you began very well with the initial questions and approach, Turi, for which i was extremely grateful. however your approach has degenerated into failing to properly interact with me in a manner that takes into account the psychologcil torturing that took place. PLEASE CORRECT THAT, and write an apology to me immediately, with an indication that you will make a much more concerted effort to be more empathetic, careful and mindful. ok? From luke.leighton at gmail.com Sat Mar 15 22:30:51 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 22:30:51 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] GMC Your enquiry - E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Fergus can you please urgently contact the GMC and find out what the hell is going on? specifically: why have they contacted the police without first writing to me to: 1. first confirm that they have all the evidence 2. second check with me that they understand the evidence you were allocated to me *by the GMC* to help protect me. yet they have directly contacted me instead of contacting you. there is *no mention whatsoever* of your communication with them. they state "thank you Mr Leighton for your messages" they do *not* state, "thank you for contacting us through Fergus Harrison, your Advocate' who will pass on our reply to you". something is very desperately wrong, here. why has the GMC contacted the police WITHOUT asking for or reviewing the VIDEO AND AUDIO EVIDENCE of negligent misconduct and assaults by multiple doctors? l. From luke.leighton at gmail.com Sat Mar 15 22:47:03 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 22:47:03 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: <4CD4EC9D3DD5439BB5FA90C89F97C3271DB94F4BDC1F@MHAENQUIRIES.CQC.ORG.UK> Message-ID: Turi: you need to follow procedures for dealing with Autistic Adults, and specifically Autistic Adults who have been subjected to Domestic Violence and also to Psychological Torture. you need to be VERY CLEAR in your words, you need to ASK QUESTIONS and you need to ANSWER mine when i ask them. it has only been about three to four days since you contacted me, and you keep repeating certain sentences without providing either context or an explanation that is adequate for an Autistic Adult subjected to torture and violence. for example: you state "there is no investigation" and repeat this statement without any clarifying context. does that mean: 1a) ALL POSSIBILITY of an investigation has been TERMINATED with prejudice, and will NEVER under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES take place or does it mean: 1b) at some (unspecified) point in the future, yet to be determined, an investigation WILL take place (100% guaranteed, based on evidence already provided) or does it mean: 1c) at some (unspecified) point in the future, the Care Quality Commission will DECIDE if an investigation will take place. this kind of ambiguity in ASCII (textual) communication is commonplace and not something that an Autistic Adult (High-Masking Autistic) can "let slide" with "common sense assumptions" that other people would accept. you also need to address the other issues that i raise, specifically: 2a) did Tina NEGLECT to pass on the video evidence (and other unanswered questions) or 2b) did Tina ACCIDENTALLY fail (for a technical reason not of her own fault but of the CQC system) to pass on the video evidence or 2c) do we already have evidence that the NHS "Trust" is flat-out lying through their teeth. i think it would help enormously if you gave me that actual letters, written (presumably by Tina?) passed to this "Trust". it is then easy to see what happened. please don't fail me. take this seriously. thank you. l. From luke.leighton at gmail.com Sat Mar 15 22:52:24 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 22:52:24 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] GMC Your enquiry - E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Saturday, March 15, 2025, lkcl wrote: > Fergus can you please urgently contact the GMC and find > out what the hell is going on? specifically: why have they > contacted the police without first writing to me to: Fergus please get: 1. the police force contacted by the General Medical Council 2. the time and date of contact 3. the Crime Reference Number provided by the police to the General Medical Council. thank you. l. From luke.leighton at gmail.com Sat Mar 15 23:01:25 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 23:01:25 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] GMC Your enquiry - E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Saturday, March 15, 2025, lkcl wrote: > > 1. the police force contacted by the General Medical Council > 2. the time and date of contact > 3. the Crime Reference Number provided by the police > to the General Medical Council. and of course 4. the full name and Badge Number of the officer contacted. i can then make a Subject Access Request to that police force in order to find out precisely what the General Medical Council has said. i am authorising you to write immediately to them with the above 4 requests, without needing to go through a review and approval phase of the communication. please ensure to cc me with the communication that you write. thank you Fergus. From luke.leighton at gmail.com Mon Mar 17 19:54:48 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 19:54:48 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: <4A58076B0C0C46B0AF1464AD3C5D91CC1DB97483AEDD@MHAENQUIRIES.CQC.ORG.UK> References: <4A58076B0C0C46B0AF1464AD3C5D91CC1DB97483AEDD@MHAENQUIRIES.CQC.ORG.UK> Message-ID: On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 2:24 PM MHA Enquiries wrote: > > > Dear Mr Leighton. > > In response to your questions below. (which are really appreciated: please accept my apologies for becoming so easily frightened. with so many people having been so systematically and devastatingly abusive, my nervous system is now automatically responding in terror at the first sign of ambiguity) > CQC does expect all complaints to have been raised to the care-providing organisation i.e. the Trust, and responded too before CQC can consider any investigation. ok. g. and o. (on phone calls to CQC) often made this clear, > For the matter relating to the items that you ordered and the hospital seized, You were not able to tell me if you had raised this complaint directly with the Trust or if you had, whether they had responded to you. answers no and no. i am simply too terrified - because of their breathtakingly-abusive and evasive responses so far - to be able to interact with them. if they *in any way* were respectful and empathetic, i would be able to work with them. however right at the very start of this process, i became deeply alarmed and frightened at Lindsay's written mis-representation of a telephone conversation i had where i was caught off-guard by the unplanned receipt of a call, and was therefore unable to record it. *if* i had been able to record it, the disparity between what she wrote was discussed, and what was actually said... > So CQC has written to the Trust to ask them if they had received it or not and if not to initiate their formal complaints procedure. ok. that's slightly different from what i understood. please *don't* send them any questions quite just yet: it's going to be crucial to ask bare-minimum questions that allow them to continue with the fabrication, then compare that against the timestamped video and photographic evidence. > So once we have a response from the provider about this item of complaint we know you have a copy of it. You can then, if you want to raise any challenges to this response with CQC. > > I appreciate you have raised numerous complaints with the Trust and have been finding it difficult to manage and escalate them as the stress impacts your health. We have previously written to you and explained that CQC does not offer an advocacy service which you might benefit from and I am sorry that we are not able to signpost you. this is a real serious issue that i cannot possibly believe i am alone in facing. i've been studying the MH Act and the sheer number of blatant violations of the Law and their legal responsibility are breathtaking. i haven't even had time yet to mention that they failed to notify me of a right to an IMHA until day SIX of being tortured! > The Mental Health Act grants the CQC a discretionary power to investigate complaints where they are about the use of the powers and duties in the Act. ... which i've been investigating and finding to be the case in a mind-numbingly overwhelming number of those same duties, listed *very clearly* in the Act. i have a friend whose son is also Autistic (the Autistm Act 2009 Statutory Report notes that a whopping 1/3 of people incarcerated within a psychiatric ward are AUTISTIC and HAVE NO MENTAL HEALTH CONDITION OF ANY KIND) and was also tortured then abandoned without support. but unlike my friend's son, i have *extensive* documentary evidence that i had to go to considerable lengths to hide, and not tell anyone INCLUDING MY MOTHER who was convinced by a psychopathic ex-business colleague with a motive (valuable IP theft) "Luke *is* harming people", in case the recording devices were seized (which happened twice, prompting me to bring in several additional devices). > If you are not satisfied with the responses provided to you > by the Trust, you could request that the CQC consider > reviewing your unresolved concerns. yes absolutely: consider this to be a formal request, but one that is actioned at an appropriate time within your remit (now? later? are there any conditions i don't yet know about?) unfortunately though, you do need to be aware that there is a bit of a mess to clean up. as a Software Engineer if i was being paid, i would normally have activated "Project Management" tools to manage the sheer overwhelming quantity of abuse and its documentation (hundreds of video entries, approximately four handwritten notes per day, and so on). > I hope this helps to make things clearer for you. it does - i feel like progress is being made, and therefore have "hope" please for god's sake don't do anything that could destroy that hope, as the repeated destruction of such, by police not listening and by abusive NHS employees, has an absolutely devastating psychological and physiological effect - well-documented: equivalent shock to a bereavement. and i have had *at least* one such incident *per month* for about eleven months: jan 24 thru nov 24. so please. *be very careful*. i need to recover, not experience further stress, distress or abuse. most people don't live through the medical symptoms i'm (transiently) displaying. how i am in any way recovering, albeit very slowly, from medical symptoms that normally cause death or permanent life-altering disability, is still a mystery. l. > Kind Regards > Miss Turi Maddison > Mental Health Act Senior Complaints Officer > Care Quality Commission > T: 03000 616161 > E: MHAenquries at cqc.org.uk > > The Care Quality Commission is the independent regulator of all health and adult social care in England. www.cqc.org.uk. For general enquiries, call the National Customer Service Centre (NCSC) on 03000 616161 or email enquiries at cqc.org.uk > Personal data is processed in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and relevant data protection law. Information on the processing of personal data by CQC can be found at http://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/our-policies/privacy-statement > Statutory requests for information made under access to information legislation such as the GDPR and the Freedom of Information Act 2000 should be sent to: information.access at cqc.org.uk > > > ------------------- Original Message ------------------- > From: lkcl ; > Received: Sat Mar 15 2025 22:47:07 GMT+0000 (Greenwich Mean Time) > To: MHAGEN ; MHAenquiries at cqc.org.uk ; > Cc: iwan.blann at hampshire.pnn.police.uk; libre-soc-dev at lists.libre-soc.org; > Subject: Re: Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES > > Turi: you need to follow procedures for dealing with Autistic > Adults, and specifically Autistic Adults who have been > subjected to Domestic Violence and also to Psychological Torture. > > you need to be VERY CLEAR in your words, you need to ASK > QUESTIONS and you need to ANSWER mine when i ask them. > > it has only been about three to four days since you contacted me, > and you keep repeating certain sentences without providing > either context or an explanation that is adequate for an Autistic > Adult subjected to torture and violence. > > for example: you state "there is no investigation" and repeat > this statement without any clarifying context. > > does that mean: > > 1a) ALL POSSIBILITY of an investigation has been TERMINATED > with prejudice, and will NEVER under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES > take place > > or does it mean: > > 1b) at some (unspecified) point in the future, yet to be determined, > an investigation WILL take place (100% guaranteed, based > on evidence already provided) > > or does it mean: > > 1c) at some (unspecified) point in the future, the Care Quality > Commission will DECIDE if an investigation will take place. > > this kind of ambiguity in ASCII (textual) communication is > commonplace and not something that an Autistic Adult > (High-Masking Autistic) can "let slide" with "common sense > assumptions" that other people would accept. > > you also need to address the other issues that i raise, > specifically: > > 2a) did Tina NEGLECT to pass on the video evidence > (and other unanswered questions) > > or > > 2b) did Tina ACCIDENTALLY fail (for a technical reason > not of her own fault but of the CQC system) to pass > on the video evidence > > or > > 2c) do we already have evidence that the NHS "Trust" > is flat-out lying through their teeth. > > i think it would help enormously if you gave me that actual > letters, written (presumably by Tina?) passed to this "Trust". > it is then easy to see what happened. > > please don't fail me. take this seriously. thank you. > > l. > -------------- The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed to or used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If this email is received in error, please notify us immediately by clicking "Reply" and delete the email. Please note that neither the Care Quality Commission nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the Care Quality Commission. Information on how the Care Quality Commission processes personal data is available here http://www.cqc.org.uk/about-us/our-policies/privacy-statement From luke.leighton at gmail.com Thu Mar 20 07:53:02 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 07:53:02 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] GMC Your enquiry - E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: thanks fergus. i want copies of all discussions and decisions with a full list of all people involved, that led to them contacting the police WITHOUT discussing with me first and without requesting or reviewing the evidence. something is seriously wrong with how they have proceeded, and i want - insist - on knowing why. as you are keenly aware they haven't even bothered to wait for the completion of reports on all violent attacks by all doctors before making a decision. On Wednesday, March 19, 2025, Fergus Harrison wrote: > Dear Luke, > > > > Thank you for your recent emails. > > > > I understand your concerns regarding the GMC’s contact with the police. While I’m unable to request the specific details you mentioned, I will get in touch with the GMC on your behalf to seek clarification about what has happened and why they proceeded in this way. > > > > Once I have a response from them, I will let you know. > > > > Please don’t hesitate to get in touch if you have any further concerns in the meantime. > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Consider the environment. Please do not print this e‑mail unless you really need to > > From: lkcl > Sent: 15 March 2025 23:01 > To: FPD Decisions > Cc: Fergus Harrison ; Libre-Soc General Development ; gabe.short at hampshire.pnn.police.uk; iwan.blann at hampshire.pnn.police.uk > Subject: Re: GMC Your enquiry - E2-1955ES > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe. > > On Saturday, March 15, 2025, lkcl wrote: > >> >> 1. the police force contacted by the General Medical Council >> 2. the time and date of contact >> 3. the Crime Reference Number provided by the police >> to the General Medical Council. > > and of course 4. the full name and Badge Number of the officer > contacted. > > i can then make a Subject Access Request to that police force > in order to find out precisely what the General Medical Council > has said. > > i am authorising you to write immediately to them with the > above 4 requests, without needing to go through a review > and approval phase of the communication. > > please ensure to cc me with the communication that you write. > > thank you Fergus. From luke.leighton at gmail.com Fri Mar 21 19:30:42 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 19:30:42 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thursday, January 9, 2025, lkcl wrote: > 4. they have ALREADY BEEN PROVIDED with photographic and video evidence and FAILED SYATEMATICALLY TO ACKNOWLEDGE OR ADDRESS IT. toni, i remember now. i *was* previously cc'ing the "trust". this includes video links where i was violently assaulted. i am so terrified of them and their abusive responses that i do not wish to engage with them directly. it is life-threateningly dangerous for me to do so. they are supposed to abide by the autism act 2009 statutory requirements, and have blatantly ignored them in such a way as to constitute VIOLENT CRIMINAL ASSAULT (noncontact GBH) not just once but repeatedly. it is 100% the case that they received the youtube video links. their claim not to have seen them is an attempt to Pervert the Course of Justice and also criminal negligence on their part, involving them creating a falsified medical record. please take this seriously. l. From luke.leighton at gmail.com Tue Mar 25 05:46:26 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 05:46:26 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] please remove all RED Semiconductor Ltd employees / agents from LS VLSI devroom In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: richard, your failure to take this seriously resulted in a year of torture, harrassment, stalking, near-death from anaphylactic shock over 100 times, 80 paramedic callouts, 4 violent assaults by A&E staff, prejuicial termination of grant funding and making it necessary for me to flee the UK in fear for my life. you had one job: listen, ask questions, and take my report seriously. as you failed utterly with that responsibility, forcing me to write a pulic TRUTHFUL report on the efforts of CALDERWOOD and LEWIS to seize control of the FOSDEM24 Schedule and unilaterally insert sub-standard commercially-driven talks that would have brought everyone into disrepute INCLUDING FOSDEM, you placed me at risk due to CALDERWOOD frivolously threatening a Libel Lawsuit (which was never actioned as he knew it would fail), then contacted my friends, family members, MPs, NLnet, NGI Search and manipulated them. my stepfather was the only one that stonewalled CALDERWOOD when he phoned saying "I want to help luke avoid a Civil lawsuit" where everyone else believed what he told them AND DID NOT CONTACT ME TO VERIFY THE FACTS. On Saturday, January 27, 2024, Richard Hartmann wrote: > Hi Luke, > > Thank you for reporting your concerns. While we do worry about your personal wellbeing and safety, we do not see a basis for forced removal of anyone from the devroom managers team. > What we will do is closely monitor the situation, and be ready to intervene immediately should an issue arise. > We have learned from other organisers that you are considering passing on your involvement in the devroom. We will share this information with the FOSDEM devrooms team, so they can be ready to assist in coordinating a handover and be in a good position to watch over the situation. > We hope you are in good health, and hope you will trust us to ensure the organisation of the overall event and the devroom will go smoothly. > > Best wishes, > Richard, on behalf of the FOSDEM Conduct Team > > Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity. > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024, 19:30 lkcl wrote: >> >> folks this is getting pretty urgent, i am not in the least >> bit safe from these individuals as agents of RED Semiconductor >> Ltd, i explained the details to Alasdair a couple weeks ago >> (Alasdair please keep the details confidential for now, even >> from the conduct team). >> >> can someone please action this removal from the devroom >> managers and libresoc-devroom and let me know straight away, >> i *cannot* interact with the mailing list until i know >> they will not be receiving messages. >> >> this is urgent. >> >> l. >> >> >> On Wednesday, January 24, 2024, lkcl wrote: >> > sorry, hit send too early. >> > that's james lewis shriya sharma andrey miroshnikov and >> > david calderwood. >> > l. >> > _______________________________________________ >> conduct mailing list >> conduct at lists.fosdem.org >> https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/conduct > From mark.filion at collabora.com Wed Mar 26 18:07:00 2025 From: mark.filion at collabora.com (Mark Filion) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:07:00 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] 2025 X.Org Foundation Membership deadline for voting in the upcoming election Message-ID: Hello, Now that the freedesktop server migration is almost done, it's time to turn our attention on the 2025 X.Org Foundation elections, which are rapidly approaching! We will be forwarding the election schedule and nominating process to the membership shortly. Please note that only current members can vote in the upcoming election, and that the deadline for new memberships or renewals to vote in the upcoming election is 23 April 2025 at 23:59 UTC. If you are interested in joining the X.Org Foundation or in renewing your membership, please visit the membership system site at: https://members.x.org/ Mark Filion, on behalf of the X.Org elections committee From luke.leighton at gmail.com Wed Mar 26 18:21:35 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:21:35 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] Care Quality Commission MHA- 03402-V5V8D1 CRM:003564199297 ZN/E2-1955ES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: toni, to give you some of what i've been subjected to by the "trust": review the response i received when i said i was being tortured and harmed through sleep deprivation. the response: "oh that's our policy". no recognition. no remorse. no acknowledgment of the austism act 2009. no apology. a simple search shows that sleep deprivation as a recognised method of torture is illegal. https://www.google.com/search?q=is+sleep+deprivation+torture+illegal it is without any shadow of doubt that violent negligent and wilfully criminal behaviour violating several laws and human rights has taken place at the location known as Antelope House. you just haven't had anyone capture overwhelming systematic evidence before. please take this matter seriously. it continues many months later to affect my life. l. From luke.leighton at gmail.com Fri Mar 28 00:36:21 2025 From: luke.leighton at gmail.com (lkcl) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:36:21 -0000 Subject: [Libre-soc-dev] PALS REF: 38242 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: lucy, hi, not your fault, but notice how there is still no response? the violent assaults took place five months ago. i suspect that the department knows that they have been negligent and are hoping that by failing to answer the problem will "go away". the fact that i have TIMESTAMPED CONCRETE EVIDENCE IN THE FORM OF A DANGEROULY HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE READING is the most likely explanation. your duty and responsibility is to get them to respond. if they do not respond then this is called "Obstruction of Justice" which is a Criminal Offense, and deeply scary as that is i do expect you to report it to the police. please bear in mind that they have ALREADY LIED TO OFFICER BLANN causing him to aggressively assault me by threatening me for "failing" to abide by NHS rules... ... when i SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED AND WAS DENIED A CHAPERONE. bottom line here you work for some very dangerous people so please be circumspect. l. On Tuesday, January 28, 2025, lkcl wrote: > thank you lucy. i am introducing you all to Sarah Charters > of the VAST Team at UHS. she has experience in dealing with > prejudice in hospitals. > > l. > > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2024, PatientSupportServices < PatientSupportServices at uhs.nhs.uk> wrote: >> Dear Luke >> >> >> >> Thank you for your email and I am sorry to hear of your further experience at ED. >> >> >> >> I have passed this on to the department and will forward on a response once I have received this. >> >> >> >> Kind regards >> >> Lucy >> >> >> >> >> >> Lucy Prestidge >> >> Patient Support Officer >> >> Patient Advice and Liaison Services (PALS) >> >> Tel No 023 8120 6325 >> >> >> >> Working Hours 0800-1600 Mon-Fri >> >> Email: pals at uhs.nhs.uk >> >> >> >> >> >> From: lkcl >> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2024 5:27 PM >> To: PatientExperience >> Cc: gmc at gmc-uk.org; iwan.blann at hampshire.pnn.police.uk; Enquiries < enquiries at cqc.org.uk>; PatientSupportServices ; hiowicb-hsi.stpeterssurgery at nhs.net >> Subject: 38242 Re: South Central Ambulance Service PE51399 >> >> >> >> Caution: This sender's email domain is not covered by the NHS secure email standard. Please do not send personal data to this address. More information on Staffnet. >> >> >> >> drat, chloe, i am so sorry. i was in chronic pain, late at night >> when i wrote this, and would like to sincerely and deeply >> apologise for sending this on "autocomplete" when it >> shoud have been to UHS PALS not SCAS PALS. >> >> your records should show i was actually transported safely >> on the 2nd, arriving appx 5pm(?) after (i think) being >> unable to speak, that morning. (my video logs will show >> exactly what happened) >> >> your team that attended on 2nd november (crossing over >> to the 3am assault on the 3rd november) were courteous, >> professional, attentative and kind, listening carefully >> and looking after me extremely well. they talked continuously >> to me, let me know what was going on, and were hugely reassuring. >> >> if i did not already say that (there have been so many >> callouts) please pass on my deepest gratitude to them. >> >> if you need to close this complaint please do so, but if >> it can be transferred to PALS instead directly by yourselves >> please kindly do so on my behalf and let me know? >> >> once again so so sorry for the mis-send. give my warmest >> regards to (Bradley?) especially for the inter-agency referral. >> >> ------ >> >> now. >> >> by complete contrast the A&E staff were awful, with notable >> exceptions: the older gentleman in white whom i believe >> is named john (frank?) he walks with a stiff back, quite >> short, he was absolutely brilliant, empathetic, kind and >> professional, as was a middle-aged bearded nurse somewhere >> around 11pm, when i was in the middle of i think the 3rd >> or 4th 60-90 minute anaphylaxis incident. he asked kindly >> if there was anything he could do: everyone else stayed away >> even to the point of not getting me water on request, forcing >> me to get up in considerable distress and get it myself. >> i was extremely grateful that he even asked. other exceptions >> were the nurse(s) who took BP/vitals readings before the shift >> change, they were courteous and professional as well. >> >> primarily it was the head nurse on duty around 5:30(?) (6?) >> who was so verbally aggressive it put me into shock AND LIKELY >> CAUSED ANOTHER TIA, BP shot up to 160 (photo evidence recorded) >> but the worst bit is that the doctors failed YET AGAIN to >> spend adequate time to compensate for the brain damage and >> PTSD, LET ALONE MY AUTISTIC MEDICAL CONDITION. >> >> to give everyone some idea: >> >> i was not even given the opportunity to SAY WHY I WAS THERE >> >> let me repeat that >> >> AT NO TIME WAS I GIVEN TIME TO EXPLAIN WHY I HAD ATTENDED A&E >> >> not going to say more until i get an acknowledgement from UHS >> PALS, i want to know that i am going to be heard, respected, and >> that it will be safe for me to communicate. >> >> nothing i have yet received from PALS gives me ANY confidence >> that they - and the staff under investigation - will lie, >> provide false information, withold information and more. >> >> you've put *demonstrably false* information to me *in writing* >> now, multiple times. that has to STOP. >> >> remember: i have at least another *EIGHT* complaints to raise >> with PALS, it is only the fact that i have been through so >> much torture and abuse and have all the symptoms of TIAs >> (micro-strokes) *on almost a daily basis* for ELEVEN MONTHS >> that is preventing me from being able to keep up with the >> overwhelming amount of abuse: worse than that it is >> re-traumatising me near-daily, harming me, and impeding any >> kind of recovery. >> >> so, PALS: let me know when you're ready to actually listen, yes? >> >> five days remain. >> >> l. >> >> >> >> On Monday, November 25, 2024, PatientExperience < patientexperience at scas.nhs.uk> wrote: >>> Dear Luke Leighton >>> >>> >>> >>> I would like to acknowledge your email received on the 25th November 2024 in which you registered a formal complaint, regarding the ambulance attendance to yourself on the 3rd November 2024. >>> >>> >>> >>> May I apologise for the distress and upset that has been caused. >>> >>> >>> >>> Your complaint has been assigned the reference number: PE 51399 >>> >>> >>> >>> The issues you raised have been forwarded for investigation and we will endeavour to answer your complaint within 25 working days, but if for any reason this is not possible, we will keep you updated. Please be assured that making a complaint will not prejudice any future care or treatment. >>> >>> >>> >>> The investigation may require us to review relevant medical records for the purposes of the investigation and may also require input from other healthcare service providers involved. This may mean we will need to share details of your complaint with those service providers. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please contact us if you have any further questions regarding consent to access relevant medical records. >>> >>> >>> >>> You have the right to support from an independent advocacy service to assist you in making your complaint against the NHS and a leaflet is enclosed detailing how they can be contacted. >>> >>> >>> >>> If you have not yet done so please can you provide a contact telephone number for yourself as the Collation of Facts Manager may need to call you to discuss the investigation. >>> >>> >>> >>> We will be in touch but in the meantime if we can be of further assistance please do not hesitate to contact the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> Yours sincerely, >>> >>> Chloe >>> >>> Chloe Foster >>> >>> Patient Experience Officer >>> >>> South Central Ambulance Service >>> >>> >>> >>> South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust >>> Southern House | Sparrowgrove | Otterbourne | Winchester | SO21 2RU >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Please note my working days are Monday-Friday* >>> >>> >>> >>> From: lkcl >>> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2024 11:56 PM >>> To: PatientExperience >>> Cc: gmc at gmc-uk.org; iwan.blann at hampshire.pnn.police.uk; Enquiries < enquiries at cqc.org.uk> >>> Subject: ASSAULT OF 03NOV2024 CRIME REF 44240479097 NHS 4390006088 >>> >>> >>> >>> dear PALS, >>> >>> please initiate a proper investigation into the assault 3nov24. >>> i am learning that the team lies to you and gets facts wrong: >>> they are unwilling systematically to engage in respectful >>> considerate dialog that properly takes into account my >>> autism (violating the autism act 2009) nor the PTSD nor the >>> neurological damage caused by 16 years as a victim of >>> Domestic Violence, which leaves me terrified beyond all reason >>> at any sign of abuse of power, and, as part of Chronic >>> Adrenal Fatigue Syndrome, leaves me in no physiological >>> position to tolerate stress of any kind: *in addition* to >>> an autistic condition which results in BRAIN SWELLING under >>> the very same stress. >>> >>> please ensure that this does not happen again, as given that >>> there is a police investigation, if they destroy evidence >>> (bodycam footage) or otherwise withold information it is >>> considered (3rd person - i am simply objectively relating >>> *my* understanding of the law here - IANAL[1] - and cannot >>> possibly be making a direct threat against you because i am >>> not the Crown, not a King's Counsel, not a Judge) >>> an extremely serious criminal offense known as "Perverting >>> the Course of Justice", which has no limit on the penalties >>> (life imprisonment especially for people who are in positions >>> of life and death power and responsibility). you don't have >>> to believe me on that: look it up for yourselves. >>> >>> you already know that i am happy to take matters to the >>> parliamentary ombudsman: i will give you seven days to >>> acknowledge receipt of this message. if i do not hear >>> from you i will assume that you are unwilling to >>> follow proper complaints procedure, that all points >>> of my complaint including those i subsequently follow >>> up with or am unable to immediately recall (due to >>> the very same brain damage that has led me to attempt >>> systematically to get care *and* also compromises my >>> ability to communicate) are unanswered and not adequately >>> addressed, such that i am free and clear to immediately >>> take the matter to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, as well >>> as report immediately to the GMC Fitness to Practice team >>> and also to the Care Quality Commission for Inspectors to >>> obtain that bodycam footage, CCTV footage and your accurate >>> complete records. >>> >>> if you can see your way to putting in place a respectful and >>> safe environment and process for me to communicate correctly >>> accurately and in full the points of my complaint, and i >>> agree to it (we work together in other words) then i would >>> be delighted and most grateful and relieved to follow it. >>> >>> the goal here is to get a written apology from you, an >>> admission that things went catastrophically wrong and could >>> have been avoided. i *will* get one, it is just a matter of >>> whether it is done quickly and easily, or done the hard way >>> which comes with much greater financial compensation for >>> increasing stress for me, with associated risk of death or >>> further brain and organ damage - something i am sure you >>> would be keen to avoid at all costs. >>> >>> i wait patiently and respectfully for the next seven days >>> to hear from you, to work together to learn from this >>> experience so that it can never happen again. >>> >>> l. >>> >>> [1] Acronym: I Am Not A Lawyer https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/IANAL >>> >>> Disclaimer: >>> >>> Any resident of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Hampshire and Oxfordshire, who is aged 14 or above, can apply to become a member of our trust. To find out more, have your views heard and get involved in shaping the future of your local ambulance service, contact our Foundation Trust Office at: getinvolved at scas.nhs.uk or call: 01869 365000 (during office hours Mon-Fri 9am-5pm). Join us, because it’s your ambulance service! Disclaimer: The information contained in this message, or any of its attachments, is privileged and confidential, and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views expressed may not be official policy of the South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any use of this communication is not authorised. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately and delete. All emails received and sent by this trust are subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and therefore may be disclosed Go green, Keep it on screen - think before you print. >>> >>> South Central Ambulance NHS Foundation Trust >>> >>> >> >> ******************************************************************************************************************** >> >> Disclaimer >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. >> Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Trust unless explicitly stated otherwise. >> If you have received this e-mail in error please delete it and contact the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Helpdesk on:- 023 807 77222 >> The information contained in this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. >> Unless the Information is legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this e-mail and your reply cannot be guaranteed. >> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for computer viruses. >> Please visit our website at http://www.uhs.nhs.uk >> >> Think of the environment. Please avoid printing this e-mail unnecessarily.