[Libre-soc-dev] RFC on mission

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 8:07 AM Alexandre Oliva <oliva at gnu.org> wrote:

> But I don't mean to exclude intermediaries, i.e., those who make
> products out of our processors.  They are also deserving of this
> freedom, at least as long as they don't deprive others of it.

ok so i rewrote the section on product designs, targetted at OEMs, to
reflect this.


> I think 'users' expresses it better than either of these, but if the
> meaning I intended was not apparent before, I wonder if spelling it as
> 'end-users' would make it clear.

end-users specifically excludes OEMs, the sales channel staff, initial
product developers and more.


> But having '(businesses and users)' as an parenthesized clarification of
> 'customers', now in the earlier bullet, seems to muddle it up a bit.

i had merged that from the 2nd misdion statement, without review/thought.

i git rid of it as its intent is covered differently.

let's keep going on this until everyone's happy and it's clear.

l.