[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 676] FORTRAN MAXLOC SVP64 example

bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org
Thu Nov 16 22:44:03 GMT 2023


--- Comment #23 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #21)
> i noticed that changing the initial value of m to 0 instead of INT_MIN is
> incorrect, since the algorithm uses signed integers.

not in the least bit bothered. this is a demo not a hardened library

removing INT_MIN which should not have been added reduces the complexity

(In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #22)

> a correct implementation starts with:

again not relevant in the least bit: it changes the scope which
is not up for negotiation.

i repeat again this a *demo*. please listen. there is no point in
you providing "enhancements" as all they do is increase the number
of lines which reduces readability FOR A DEMO.

please LISTEN when i state very clearly what the scope is.

if you are tempted to make suggestions that increase the number
of lines *please refrain from writing anything at all* as all it
does is aggravate.

if on the other hand you find bugs or wish to help move this forward
then you are most welcome.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the libre-soc-bugs mailing list