[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 1070] Simple-V / Libre-SOC FOSDEM Conference Feb 03-04 2024

[bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1070

--- Comment #26 from Andrey Miroshnikov <andrey at technepisteme.xyz> ---
Updated comment #0, and looked at the Luke's corrections in the CfP.

I've made a bunch fixes based on your review Luke.

Order dates:
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=19f2b9ff94a82c17b651d91981953c34d3d91dc6
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=9cccb0dcaef7473b3df7073c2ebf5a9a86432e58
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=9396c23215c59ef44d1a440b54197c8ee1d4aeb5

Add different time slots for talks back:
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=cbba3e58a6619614f6280bed8e2df5805c8b1da8

Update submission section by making sure the right devroom is chosen.
Copied section on recording licensing from open hardware CfP (with
attribution):
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=4ac94b73227ce931edbc6bc3faccc0262c9cecf6
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=acf5e5bc237b22252ffd5e0689c6d4eef9206680
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=5a745c02672d31cc53ec271bc41b81aa4fbca106
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=3fdfe4410faa05b4f7444b6b66274e146958acc8
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=bb84c6fe83378f8e7b20d64e2fc287ac0214f49d

Change heading levels:
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=5e8c6f694045b260e0ce139d09c4b7d3412c53c1
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=186059dcabbb2403ae1f7bd338a3e0ad0f62c549

Move links section to the top:
https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=libreriscv.git;a=commitdiff;h=8a360c41d0541ee8dc80e276b8d1710c2522c099

Luke, you've also made a point of making the CfP shorter:
https://lists.libre-soc.org/pipermail/libre-soc-dev/2023-November/005791.html

Sections that might be worth cutting to reduce size:
- 1.2.1 "What is FOSDEM?" (Already have a link to the FOSDEM homepage and FAQ)
- 1.3.2 "Optional" (optional information regarding submission)
- First three bullet points in section 1.4 "Things to be aware of" (although
probably better to leave this)
- Merge 1.5 "Important Dates" with the "key dates" at the top of the CfP

I don't know if we want to cut down the "Desirable Topics section", as that is
what those interested will be looking at as guidance.


Please all have a look and make sure the formatting and content of CfP still
looks good.
And let me know if you agree with cutting down and/or editing the above
mentioned sections.
If you think there's a better way to word a section to reduce duplication,
please let me know.


I will wait until Luke has had sufficient time to review before re-submitting
(and apologising to the FOSDEM organisers for the confusion).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.