[Libre-soc-bugs] [Bug 517] Define JTAG pins and set up with litex for ulx3s85f

bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org bugzilla-daemon at libre-soc.org
Sun Apr 11 23:54:02 BST 2021


https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517

--- Comment #135 from Cole Poirier <colepoirier at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #133)
> (In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #128)
> > (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #127)
> > > also: why have you removed the VERSA ECP5 images and tables?
> > > what is the purpose of removing perfectly good information
> > > that does not need modification?
> > 
> > Because it is not good information, you need to update it to conform to the
> > ft232 wiring colours.
> 
> this forces me to switch tasks, risking leaving Jean-Paul and Staf without
> support.
> 
> please for god's sake understand that your continued desire to dodge
> responsibility for this task is having consequences.

I am not desiring to, nor attempting to dodge responsibility, you are
projecting. Your choices here have wasted 4 of the 7 days we had to meet the
tapeout deadline. Please understand that. Please have some humility. Please be
helpful instead of the opposite. 

> please urgently take steps to minimise the amount of work that i am required
> to
> do.
> 
> please restore the VERSA_ECP5 images
> 
> please restore the colours to match the VERSA_ECP5.
> 
> please ensure that the page states that people may have different FT232
> devices
> 
> please edit the DCD FT232 image (which is the device that i have here) has
> the correct colours.
> 
> please ensure that the pin numbering tables match the two FT232 devices, one
> that you have, and one that i have.
> 
> please add a note stating that many people wishing to connect FT232 devices
> will need to check the pin ordering and go by the colours.
> 
> and please do this promptly, without fuss, *and without trying to do dodge
> responsibility*, and without burdening me with additional tasks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the libre-soc-bugs mailing list