[libre-riscv-dev] IEEE754 FPU

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 3:38 PM Aleksandar Kostovic
<alexandar.kostovic at gmail.com> wrote:

> No need, comments are good and I understand it. I am happy with the code as
> it is very clear and straightforward :)

 it's pretty "duUuuh", isn't it? :)  um i actually accidentally was
looking at multiply.v instead, and it took me an hour to realise it
wasn't adder.v.  the reason: most of the phases are absolutely
identical.  so that means we can create base classes that cover the
majority of the ALU tasks.

also i believe that the double-versions are just... different magic constants.

l.